Don't fall for One Step Ahead scam review! Learn the TRUTH here
Is One Step Ahead a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here Name: One Step Ahead Niche: Binary Options Website: **[>>You can visit our website for our full review here<<] (www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/one-step-ahead.html) Is One Step Ahead a scam or real? For this Binary Options Review Panther Reddit review of One Step Ahead scam and whether or not One Step Ahead review is a scam or not I will focus on the red flags of One Step Ahead scam review and why you should avoid One Step Ahead scam review. There are many Binary Option software on the market that would be more acceptable than One Step Ahead Binary Options. [>>For my Binary Option Software Top Picks List, click here.<<] (www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/top-binary-option-software-picks.html) Is One Step Ahead a scam or real? One Step Ahead software scam has the Red Flags of a Binary Option scam that shares many traits with other Binary Option scams all over the market. Below I will cover the bullet points as to why One Step Ahead is a scam and should be avoided: There are no trading simulations with the One Step Ahead scam review promotion video that proves the One Step Ahead scam software actually works As far as I have seen, I have yet see any trading simulations with One Step Ahead scam review anywhere on the internet. Even on the One Step Ahead scam review website, not a single person traded with the One Step Ahead scam software to test it. You are required to trust the One Step Ahead scam review presentation on its word and sign up with it, without any simulation of the One Step Ahead software to engage you into signing up with it. In a time full of Binary Option scams, I don't recommend just taking the word of someone who is paid to give you their word that the One Step Ahead scam review software actually works. Thats just foolish. It's difficult to gauge the authenticity of a Binary Option software if no one has even tried it, or has been successful with the One Step Ahead scam review software in general. One Step Ahead scam review has yet to prove it can make anyone money with Binary Option Trading As stated above, there is no proof that One Step Ahead scam review actually works before you try it. Normally on youtube and other social mediums, there are people who discuss or do videos of their Binary Option trading and whether or not it is actually good. With One Step Ahead scam review, I haven't seen any sign of that, just negative reviews of people who have buyers remorse with One Step Ahead scam review. Generally I would recommend a Binary Option software if it has an overwhelming amount of positive reviews, and I thoroughly enjoy using it personally, however that is not the case with One Step Ahead scam review. Too many negative reviews of One Step Ahead bot to take One Step Ahead scam review seriously as a professional Binary Option software to sign up with As of right now, there are more One Step Ahead scam reviews than positive reviews. That is a bad sign with a Binary Option software, and I highly recommend Many people are complaining and are thoroughly not interested with One Step Ahead scam review. For that reason, with good conscience, I cannot recommend One Step Ahead scam review. One Step Ahead scam review is run by paid actors to promote it Finally, the people who present the One Step Ahead scam review are paid actors who push the product with a faulty algorithm and promise way too much money from it. These are all deceptive tactics of a Binary Option scam that I have seen countless times over the years to the point it makes me sick. I would expect the actual creators to come forward and sell their product, instead they paid someone $5 on the internet to push their product for them, and act like it will make everyone SO Much money. For this reason, I cannot in good conscience recommend One Step Ahead scam review, because it is another red flag of a Binary Option scam I always tell people to avoid in my Binary Option Review Panther reviews. There are many Binary Option software out there that would be a better Binary Option software to sign up with than One Step Ahead review. For the points I covered above, there is no other reason why anyone should consider signing up with One Step Ahead scam review. If anyone has any questions about Binary Option software, or about One Step Ahead review, [click here for my email] ([email protected]). I love to answer emails personally. Good luck trading Julia Armstrong Binary Options Review Panther www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/iq-options.html www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/auto-binary-signals.html www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/binary-option-trading-signals.html Tags: One Step Ahead scam, One Step Ahead Binary, is One Step Ahead compatable with Binary Option Robot?, One Step Ahead facebook, One Step Ahead wall street, One Step Ahead real, is One Step Ahead compatable with IQ Option?, One Step Ahead live, One Step Ahead twitter, One Step Ahead JP Morgan, One Step Ahead Binary Options, One Step Ahead trading, is One Step Ahead compatable with Porter Finance?, One Step Ahead tumblr, One Step Ahead stock market, One Step Ahead 2014 trading account, One Step Ahead trading, is One Step Ahead compatable with Banc De Binary?, One Step Ahead trading simulation, is One Step Ahead compatable with bloomex?, One Step Ahead One Step Ahead account broker, One Step Ahead pinterest, One Step Ahead George Soros,is One Step Ahead a scam or real?, is One Step Ahead real?, is One Step Ahead compatable with 24 Option.com?, is One Step Ahead too good to be true, One Step Ahead 2016 account, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead myspace, is One Step Ahead compatable with HY Options?, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead real scam, One Step Ahead software, is One Step Ahead compatable with Redwood? One Step Ahead reddit, One Step Ahead Binary Options account, One Step Ahead trading live, is One Step Ahead compatable with Option Fair?, One Step Ahead signals, One Step Ahead wordpress, One Step Ahead 2016, One Step Ahead preferred account, is One Step Ahead compatable with Finpari?, One Step Ahead free, One Step Ahead blogger, is One Step Ahead compatable with High Low?, is One Step Ahead free?, One Step Ahead Binary Options review, where can I download One Step Ahead free?, One Step Ahead imgur, One Step Ahead Binary Options scam review, One Step Ahead free income online with, One Step Ahead download for free, is One Step Ahead compatable with Top Option?, One Step Ahead Binary Options, One Step Ahead game stop, is One Step Ahead compatable with Goptions?, One Step Ahead bit coin, One Step Ahead binary options live trading account, is One Step Ahead compatable with Stockpair?, One Step Ahead 2015 account, One Step Ahead forex, is One Step Ahead compatable with Trade Thunder?, One Step Ahead 2015 trading account, One Step Ahead forex trading account with, One Step Ahead scam or real? is One Step Ahead compatable with Cherry Trade?, One Step Ahead Binary Options scam, One Step Ahead bitcoin free account with, One Step Ahead Binary Options trading bot, One Step Ahead is compatable with Boss Capital?, One Step Ahead 2015, One Step Ahead best of 2014, is One Step Ahead compatable with No1 Options?, One Step Ahead bot, One Step Ahead Binary Options bot, One Step Ahead youtube account, One Step Ahead scam review, One Step Ahead best of 2015, is One Step Ahead compatable with tradorax?, One Step Ahead Binary Options live, One Step Ahead facebook account, top 5 Binary Option software One Step Ahead , One Step Ahead gmail account, is One Step Ahead compatable with 10 trade?, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead 2014 account, One Step Ahead Binary Options Broker live trading account live trading account, One Step Ahead broker, One Step Ahead is compatable with empire option?, One Step Ahead pinterest account, One Step Ahead live broker account, One Step Ahead yahoo account, is One Step Ahead compatable with binary brokerz?, One Step Ahead trading bot, One Step Ahead Binary Options scam or real? One Step Ahead Binary Options scam review, One Step Ahead free broker account, One Step Ahead account, is One Step Ahead compatable with BK Trading?, is One Step Ahead compatable with anyoption?, One Step Ahead scam review, is One Step Ahead compatable with UK Options?, One Step Ahead Binary free trading account, One Step Ahead Options live, One Step Ahead window 7, is One Step Ahead compatable with Optek.com?, One Step Ahead watchdog, One Step Ahead window 8, One Step Ahead 2014, is One Step Ahead compatable with Binary Tilt?, One Step Ahead 2014 trading account, One Step Ahead roy tribble, One Step Ahead windows 10, One Step Ahead brokers, is One Step Ahead compatable with Trade Rush?, One Step Ahead real, One Step Ahead roy tribble reviews, One Step Ahead proof, One Step Ahead the truth, Get One Step Ahead Review, One Step Ahead app, One Step Ahead information, One Step Ahead url, One Step Ahead website, One Step Ahead youtube video, One Step Ahead trading software, get One Step Ahead, article about One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead computer program, One Step Ahead the truth, One Step Ahead support, One Step Ahead support email address, One Step Ahead help desk, similar than One Step Ahead, better than One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead contact, One Step Ahead demo, One Step Ahead video tutorial, how does One Step Ahead work, is One Step Ahead system the best online isOne Step Ahead a scam, does One Step Ahead really work, does One Step Ahead actually work, One Step Ahead members area, One Step Ahead login page, One Step Ahead verification, One Step Ahead software reviews, One Step Ahead no fake review, One Step Ahead Live Broadcast, is One Step Ahead real, One Step Ahead forex trading, One Step Ahead binary options trading, One Step Ahead automated app, the One Step Ahead review, One Step Ahead signals, One Step Ahead mac os x, One Step Ahead broker sign up, One Step Ahead free download, reviews of One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead live results, One Step Ahead bonus, One Step Ahead honest review, One Step Ahead 2016, One Step Ahead 2015, is One Step Ahead worth the risk, One Step Ahead pc desktop, One Step Ahead Microsoft, is One Step Ahead compatable with Magnum Options?, One Step Ahead live account, One Step Ahead Binary Options Watchdog, One Step Ahead Playstation 4, One Step Ahead Binary Option broker, is One Step Ahead compatable with exbino.com?, One Step Ahead I saw it first,is One Step Ahead compatable with options xo?, One Step Ahead this, One Step Ahead real or fake, is One Step Ahead Method live trades real, One Step Ahead is this a scam, is One Step Ahead reliable?, One Step Ahead Review, One Step Ahead honest reviews, One Step Ahead is it a scam, One Step Ahead download software, One Step Ahead app review, is compatable with finacial trader?, One Step Ahead software download, One Step Ahead forum, One Step Ahead signals, One Step Ahead download page, One Step Ahead software demo somebody using it, One Step Ahead binary software, One Step Ahead binary options review, One Step Ahead members, is One Step Ahead compatable with option web?, One Step Ahead scam or legit,One Step Ahead comments, minimum deposit for One Step Ahead, One Step Ahead reviews, is One Step Ahead compatable with option rally? One Step Ahead binary today, One Step Ahead system pro review, One Step Ahead windows 7, One Step Ahead windows 8 and windows XP, One Step Ahead scam or real, login, has anybody out there made any money out of it with One Step Ahead?,
Can you Trust Greg Insider Method? Learn the TRUTH here
Is Greg Insider Method a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here Name: Greg Insider Method Niche: Binary Options Type: Refundable loss Binary Option Website: You can visit our website for our full review here: www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/greg-insider-method.html Is Greg Insider Method a scam or real? In this Binary Option Review Panther Review of Greg Insider Method review, I will cover the points as to why Greg Insider Method is one of the better Binary Option software on the market, and why everyone should sign up with Greg Insider Method. Looking for other Binary Option software you can trust? Visit the Binary Option Review Panther website for other Binary Option software recommended by many Binary Option traders, just like yourself. >>>For my Binary Option Software Top Picks List, click here.<<< Is Greg Insider Method a scam or real? As of right now I cannot recommend Greg Insider Method scam review enough. Greg Insider Method is one of the many Binary Option software that I recommend on my Binary Option software top picks list which is full of many Binary Option software that so many countless Binary Option traders recommend. With such overwhelming success of it's first release, Greg Insider Method has decided to be released again this year for others to enjoy another wave of Binary Option software profits through Greg Insider Method. Personally, I did not catch the first wave of Greg Insider Method review and the overwhelming amount of success that others have reported from Greg Insider Method review, which is why I am writing a review on Greg Insider Method, so others do not miss out on this one. Below I will cover the points as to how Greg Insider Method is different than the rest: Experience you can trust with Greg Insider Method Unlike other Binary Option software that has been created in someones garage overnight with a faulty algorithm, Greg Insider Method review is different and more professional. Greg Insider Method review has the quality that you can trust in a Binary Option software that actually works. The people behind Greg Insider Method scam review have over 12 years worth of experience with trading and working with Forex before they decided to work with Greg Insider Method scam review. Forex is known for having a more fair trading experience than Binary Options, and I always recommend the quality of any Binary Option software from anyone who has dabbled with Forex. Greg Insider Method is powered by a algorithm that actually works and has been field tested over and over again. There is nothing else that even compares with Greg Insider Method review when it comes to quality. The $500,000 dollar guarantee With Greg Insider Method review, there is one guarantee that they can promise their Binary Option traders that sign up: The $500,000 guarantee. Yes, with Greg Insider Method review, there is a $500,000 cap with losing trades, meaning that no losses are on the Binary Option trader that signs up with Greg Insider Method review. Greg Insider Method review has a contract with their Binary Option traders and Binary Option broker that Greg Insider Method review will absorb the losses of any Binary Option trader who signs up with Greg Insider Method review, meaning that the Binary Option trader can't lose with Greg Insider Method review. It's a win win situation. Greg Insider Method review puts all their effort into making sure all of their Binary Option traders are happy and content and shouldn't have to worry about losses with Greg Insider Method review, like they would worry with other Binary Option Trader software on the market. Greg Insider Method is highly recommended by countless other Binary Option traders, not just me On the Greg Insider Method review website, you can see and read the countless testimonials for the Greg Insider Method review from the countless happy Binary Option Traders that have had success and their lives have changed thanks to the Greg Insider Method review software and the team of professionals behind it. At this point I have yet to really see any unhappy Binary Option traders with Greg Insider Method review. The majority that have enjoyed Greg Insider Method review give the Greg Insider Method review team absolutely nothing but praise for all the work they have done. Benefits of joining Greg Insider Method review No download is necessary with the Greg Insider Method software Payouts reported up to 90% with winning trades with Greg Insider Method! Wow! Experience you can trust with Greg Insider Methods review If anyone has any questions about Binary Option software, or about One Step Ahead review, click here for my email>>> [email protected]. I love to answer emails personally. Good luck trading Julia Armstrong Binary Options Review Panther www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/iq-options.htmlwww.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/auto-binary-signals.htmlwww.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/binary-option-trading-signals.html Tags: Greg Insider Method scam, Greg Insider Method Binary, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Binary Option Robot?, Greg Insider Method facebook, Greg Insider Method wall street, Greg Insider Method real, is Greg Insider Method compatable with IQ Option?, Greg Insider Method live, Greg Insider Method twitter, Greg Insider Method JP Morgan, Greg Insider Method Binary Options, Greg Insider Method trading, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Porter Finance?, Greg Insider Method tumblr, Greg Insider Method stock market, Greg Insider Method 2014 trading account, Greg Insider Method trading, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Banc De Binary?, Greg Insider Method trading simulation, is Greg Insider Method compatable with bloomex?, Greg Insider Method account broker, Greg Insider Method pinterest, Greg Insider Method George Soros,is Greg Insider Method a scam or real?, is Greg Insider Method real?, is Greg Insider Method compatable with 24 Option.com?, is Greg Insider Method too good to be true, Greg Insider Method 2016 account, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method myspace, is Greg Insider Method compatable with HY Options?, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method real scam, Greg Insider Method software, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Redwood? Greg Insider Method reddit, Greg Insider Method Binary Options account, Greg Insider Method trading live, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Option Fair?, Greg Insider Method signals, Greg Insider Method wordpress, Greg Insider Method 2016, Greg Insider Method preferred account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Finpari?, Greg Insider Method free, Greg Insider Method blogger, is Greg Insider Method compatable with High Low?, is Greg Insider Method free?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options review, where can I download Greg Insider Method free?, Greg Insider Method imgur, Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam review, Greg Insider Method free income online with, Greg Insider Method download for free, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Top Option?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options, Greg Insider Method game stop, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Goptions?, Greg Insider Method bit coin, Greg Insider Method binary options live trading account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Stockpair?, Greg Insider Method 2015 account, Greg Insider Method forex, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Trade Thunder?, Greg Insider Method 2015 trading account, Greg Insider Method forex trading account with, Greg Insider Method scam or real? is Greg Insider Method compatable with Cherry Trade?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam, Greg Insider Method bitcoin free account with, Greg Insider Method Binary Options trading bot, Greg Insider Method is compatable with Boss Capital?, Greg Insider Method 2015, Greg Insider Method best of 2014, is Greg Insider Method compatable with No1 Options?, Greg Insider Method bot, Greg Insider Method Binary Options bot, Greg Insider Method youtube account, Greg Insider Method scam review, Greg Insider Method best of 2015, is Greg Insider Method compatable with tradorax?, Greg Insider Method Binary Options live, Greg Insider Method facebook account, top 5 Binary Option softwareGreg Insider Method , Greg Insider Method gmail account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with 10 trade?, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method 2014 account, Greg Insider Method Binary Options Broker live trading account live trading account, Greg Insider Method broker, Greg Insider Method is compatable with empire option?, Greg Insider Method pinterest account, Greg Insider Method live broker account, Greg Insider Method yahoo account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with binary brokerz?, Greg Insider Method trading bot, Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam or real? Greg Insider Method Binary Options scam review, Greg Insider Method free broker account, Greg Insider Method account, is Greg Insider Method compatable with BK Trading?, is Greg Insider Method compatable with anyoption?, Greg Insider Method scam review, is Greg Insider Method compatable with UK Options?, Greg Insider Method Binary free trading account, Greg Insider Method Options live, Greg Insider Method window 7, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Optek.com?, Greg Insider Method watchdog, Greg Insider Method window 8, Greg Insider Method 2014, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Binary Tilt?, Greg Insider Method 2014 trading account, Greg Insider Method roy tribble, Greg Insider Method windows 10, Greg Insider Method brokers, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Trade Rush?, Greg Insider Method real, Greg Insider Method roy tribble reviews, Greg Insider Method proof, Greg Insider Method the truth, Get Greg Insider Method Review, Greg Insider Method app, Greg Insider Method information, Greg Insider Method url, Greg Insider Method website, Greg Insider Method youtube video, Greg Insider Method trading software, get Greg Insider Method, article about Greg Insider Method, Greg Insider Method computer program, Greg Insider Method the truth, Greg Insider Method support, Greg Insider Method support email address, Greg Insider Method help desk, similar than Greg Insider Method, better than Greg Insider Method, OGreg Insider Method contact,Greg Insider Method demo, Greg Insider Method video tutorial, how does Greg Insider Method work, is Greg Insider Method system the best online is Greg Insider Method a scam, does Greg Insider Method really work, does Greg Insider Method actually work, Greg Insider Method members area, Greg Insider Method login page, Greg Insider Method verification, Greg Insider Method software reviews, Greg Insider Method no fake review, Greg Insider Method Live Broadcast, is Greg Insider Method real, Greg Insider Method forex trading, Greg Insider Method binary options trading, Greg Insider Method automated app, the Greg Insider Method review, Greg Insider Method signals, Greg Insider Method mac os x, Greg Insider Method broker sign up, Greg Insider Method free download, reviews of Greg Insider Method, Greg Insider Method live results, Greg Insider Method bonus, Greg Insider Method honest review, Greg Insider Method 2016, Greg Insider Method 2015, is Greg Insider Method worth the risk,Greg Insider Method pc desktop, Greg Insider Method Microsoft, is Greg Insider Method compatable with Magnum Options?, Greg Insider Method live account, Greg Insider Method Binary Options Watchdog, Greg Insider Method Playstation 4, Greg Insider Method Binary Option broker, is Greg Insider Method compatable with exbino.com?, Greg Insider Method I saw it first,is Greg Insider Method compatable with options xo?, Greg Insider Method this, Greg Insider Method real or fake, is Greg Insider Method live trades real, Greg Insider Method is this a scam, is Greg Insider Method reliable?, Greg Insider Method Review, Greg Insider Method honest reviews, Greg Insider Method is it a scam, Greg Insider Method download software, Greg Insider Method app review, is compatable with finacial trader?, Greg Insider Method software download, Greg Insider Method forum, Greg Insider Method signals, Greg Insider Method download page, Greg Insider Method software demo somebody using it, Greg Insider Method binary software, Greg Insider Method binary options review, Greg Insider Method members, is Greg Insider Method compatable with option web?, Greg Insider Method scam or legit,Greg Insider Method comments, minimum deposit for Greg Insider Method, Greg Insider Method reviews, is Greg Insider Method compatable with option rally? Greg Insider Method binary today, Greg Insider Method system pro review, Greg Insider Method windows 7, Greg Insider Method windows 8 and windows XP, Greg Insider Method scam or real, login, has anybody out there made any money out of it with Greg Insider Method?
Is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here
>>>Click here for the Star Wars Binary Option review to learn more about Star Wars Binary Option Bot review<<< Is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam or real? Learn the TRUTH here with our Star Wars Binary Bot review here. If anyone has any questions about Binary Option software, or about Star Wars Binary Bot review, you can emails us at: [email protected] I love to answer emails personally! Name Star Wars Binary Bot review Niche: Binary Options Type: Dark Pool Website: Is Star Wars Binary Bot review a scam or real? This Binary Option Review Panther reddit review of the Star Wars Binary Bot review is dedicated to determining whether or not Star Wars Binary Bot review is a scam or real. I generally will investigate a Binary Option software to determine if it has any Binary Option scams red flags, however from what I have seen and heard, Star Wars Binary Bot review is the real deal. Many people are already signing up with Star Wars Binary Bot review and expect to make HUGE profits from the Star Wars Binary Bot review. Star Wars Binary Bot review, thankfully is far from a Binary Option scam. Star Wars Binary Bot review is a Binary Option software hand made to perfection for many people to enjoy. The Star Wars Binary Bot has a different algorithm that makes it one of the most profitable Binary Option software out there, I cannot recommend Star Wars Binary Bot review enough! What is Star Wars Binary Bot scam review? Star Wars Binary Bot scam review was released earlier this week and already many people are talking about Star Wars Binary Bot scam review. So far a large amount of people are expecting big things from Star Wars Binary Bot scam review even though it's only been on the Binary Option market for less than a week. The Star Wars Binary Bot scam review is one of the coolest Binary Option software on the market right now. Star Wars Binary Bot scam review is expected to have huge results once more people sign up with Star Wars Binary Bot scam review. Who is behind Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options? Allen Vader, of course. Although the creator calls himself Allen Vader, I do believe he made up his last name to show off just how much he loves Star Wars [It's apparent when looking at the Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options website], he is a Binary Option trader, just like everyone who uses Binary Option trading. He is the end result of sticking with Binary Option trading. Allen Vader credits his success with Binary Option trading with sticking with it and not giving up, and eventually he hit it big, and then created Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options to complete his dream of Binary Options and Star Wars, rolled into one. What makes Star Wars Binary Bot Binary different than the rest? Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is a unique Binary Option software that has an even more unique algorithm behind Star Wars Binary Bot Binary. Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is powered by the Dark Pool. What is the Dark Pool? Consider it a exclusive club of stock trading so to speak, that only a few people know about, and use. Famous Billionaires such as Warren Buffette and George Soros have made their billions trading in the Dark Pool. It is unknown exactly how much is drawn into the Dark Pool of trading, but some estimate millions upon millions of dollars are left untouched, which is where Star Wars Binary Bot Binary comes in. Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is specialized in tapping into those millions of dollars using the Star Wars Binary Bot formula that specializes in Dark Pool Binary Option trading. The Dark Pool needs more traders in order to be successful. The more people are trading with Star Wars Binary Bot Binary, the more successful and profitable Star Wars Binary Bot Binary is. Benefits of signing up with the Star Wars Binary Bot review website: Access to the Dark Pool with Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Option review, unheard of in Binary Option trading until today High pay outs, up to even 89% with winning trades with Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Option review, wow! Conclusion with Star Wars Binary Bot review I expect good things from Star Wars Binary Bot review, along with many others who are signing up for Star Wars Binary Bot review. The Dark Pool is definetily looking like something that hopefully will be implemented into future Binary Option software for others to enjoy as well. Good luck trading Julia Armstrong Binary Options Review Panther You can watch our youtube video for Star Wars Binary Bot review here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-SmwrU30Hc www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/iq-options.html www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/auto-binary-signals.html www.binaryoptionsreviewpanther.com/binary-option-trading-signals.html Tags: Star Wars Binary Bot scam, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Binary Option Robot?, Star Wars Binary Bot facebook, Star Wars Binary Bot wall street, Star Wars Binary Bot real, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with IQ Option?, Star Wars Binary Bot live, Star Wars Binary Bot twitter, Star Wars Binary Bot JP Morgan, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options, Star Wars Binary Bot trading, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Porter Finance?, Star Wars Binary Bot tumblr, Star Wars Binary Bot stock market, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014 trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot trading, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Banc De Binary?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading simulation, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with bloomex?,Star Wars Binary Bot account broker, Star Wars Binary Bot pinterest, Star Wars Binary Bot George Soros,is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam or real?, is Star Wars Binary Bot real?, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with 24 Option.com?, is Star Wars Binary Bot too good to be true, Star Wars Binary Bot 2016 account, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot myspace, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with HY Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot real scam, Star Wars Binary Bot software, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Redwood? Star Wars Binary Bot reddit, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options account, Star Wars Binary Bot trading live, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Option Fair?, Star Wars Binary Bot signals, Star Wars Binary Bot wordpress, Star Wars Binary Bot 2016, Star Wars Binary Bot preferred account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Finpari?, Star Wars Binary Bot free, Star Wars Binary Bot blogger, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with High Low?, is Star Wars Binary Bot free?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options review, where can I download Star Wars Binary Bot free?,Star Wars Binary Bot imgur, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam review, Star Wars Binary Bot free income online with, Star Wars Binary Bot download for free, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Top Option?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options, Star Wars Binary Bot game stop, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Goptions?, Star Wars Binary Bot bit coin, Star Wars Binary Bot binary options live trading account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Stockpair?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015 account, Star Wars Binary Bot forex, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Trade Thunder?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015 trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot forex trading account with, Star Wars Binary Bot scam or real? is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Cherry Trade?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam, Star Wars Binary Bot bitcoin free account with, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot is compatable with Boss Capital?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015, Star Wars Binary Bot best of 2014, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with No1 Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot bot, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options bot, Star Wars Binary Bot youtube account, Star Wars Binary Bot scam review, Star Wars Binary Bot best of 2015, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with tradorax?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options live, Star Wars Binary Bot facebook account, top 5 Binary Option software, Star Wars Binary Bot , Star Wars Binary Bot gmail account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with 10 trade?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014 account, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options Broker live trading account live trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot broker, Star Wars Binary Bot is compatable with empire option?, Star Wars Binary Bot pinterest account, Star Wars Binary Bot live broker account, Star Wars Binary Bot yahoo account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with binary brokerz?, Star Wars Binary Bot trading bot, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam or real? Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options scam review, Star Wars Binary Bot free broker account, Star Wars Binary Bot account, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with BK Trading?, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with anyoption?, Star Wars Binary Bot scam review, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with UK Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary free trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot Options live, Star Wars Binary Bot window 7, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Optek.com?, Star Wars Binary Bot watchdog, Star Wars Binary Bot window 8, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Binary Tilt?, Star Wars Binary Bot 2014 trading account, Star Wars Binary Bot roy tribble, Star Wars Binary Bot windows 10, Star Wars Binary Bot brokers, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Trade Rush?, Star Wars Binary Bot real, Star Wars Binary Bot roy tribble reviews, Star Wars Binary Bot proof, Star Wars Binary Bot the truth, Star Wars Binary Bot Method Review, Star Wars Binary Bot app, Star Wars Binary Bot information, Star Wars Binary Bot url, Star Wars Binary Bot website, Star Wars Binary Bot youtube video, Star Wars Binary Bot trading software, get Star Wars Binary Bot, article about Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot computer program, Star Wars Binary Bot the truth, Star Wars Binary Bot support, Star Wars Binary Bot support email address, Star Wars Binary Bot help desk, similar than Star Wars Binary Bot, better than Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot contact, Star Wars Binary Bot demo, Star Wars Binary Bot video tutorial, how does Star Wars Binary Bot work, is Star Wars Binary Bot system the best online is Star Wars Binary Bot a scam, does Star Wars Binary Bot really work, does Star Wars Binary Bot actually work, Star Wars Binary Bot members area, Star Wars Binary Bot login page, Star Wars Binary Bot verification, Star Wars Binary Bot software reviews, Star Wars Binary Bot no fake review, Star Wars Binary Bot Live Broadcast, is Star Wars Binary Bot real, Star Wars Binary Bot forex trading, Star Wars Binary Bot binary options trading, Star Wars Binary Bot automated app, the Star Wars Binary Bot review, Star Wars Binary Bot signals, Star Wars Binary Bot mac os x, Star Wars Binary Bot broker sign up, Star Wars Binary Bot free download, reviews of Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot live results, Star Wars Binary Bot bonus, Star Wars Binary Bot honest review, Star Wars Binary Bot 2016, Star Wars Binary Bot 2015, is Star Wars Binary Bot worth the risk, Star Wars Binary Bot pc desktop, Star Wars Binary Bot Microsoft, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with Magnum Options?, Star Wars Binary Bot live account, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Options Watchdog, Star Wars Binary Bot Playstation 4, Star Wars Binary Bot Binary Option broker, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with exbino.com?, Star Wars Binary Bot I saw it first,is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with options xo?, Star Wars Binary Bot this, Star Wars Binary Bot real or fake, is Star Wars Binary Bot live trades real, Star Wars Binary Bot is this a scam, is Star Wars Binary Bot reliable?, Star Wars Binary Bot Review, Star Wars Binary Bot honest reviews, Star Wars Binary Bot is it a scam, Star Wars Binary Bot download software, Star Wars Binary Bot app review, is compatable with finacial trader?, Star Wars Binary Bot software download, Star Wars Binary Bot forum, Star Wars Binary Bot signals, Star Wars Binary Bot download page, Star Wars Binary Bot software demo somebody using it, Star Wars Binary Bot binary software, Star Wars Binary Bot binary options review, Star Wars Binary Bot members, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with option web?, Star Wars Binary Bot scam or legit, Star Wars Binary Bot comments, minimum deposit for Star Wars Binary Bot, Star Wars Binary Bot reviews, is Star Wars Binary Bot compatable with option rally? Star Wars Binary Bot binary today, Star Wars Binary Bot system pro review, Star Wars Binary Bot windows 7, Star Wars Binary Bot windows 8 and windows XP, Star Wars Binary Bot scam or real, login, has anybody out there made any money out of it with Star Wars Binary Bot?,
AUTO PROFITS TRADES REVIEW 2015 - IS AUTO PROFITS TRADES SCAM OR LEGIT? SO HOW DOES F AUTO PROFITS TRADES SOFTWARE WORK? AUTO PROFITS TRADES BY DAVID H. BROWN REVIEW
Auto Profits Trades By David H. Brown’s Is Auto Profits Trades Software A Scam Or True? Does Auto Profits Trades Relay work? My Auto Profits Trades Share With You My Auto Profits Trades System Experience & Results. Click Here To Claim Your Fortune Trader LIFETIME User License!! $10,000. (INSIDE) URGENT – Unclaimed Money $10,000 A DAY? without lifting a finger? If making money online COULD be as easy as writing your own check… 3 minutes into the Auto Profits Trades video? Yep. That’s a MILLION dollars, right there. All made with virtually no effort. Watch it and see for yourself: Auto Profits Trades David Brown, sounds familiar? The Auto Profits Trades new $8,000 – $13,000 a day system 100% Proven & 100% Tested – Binary Option Bot David Brown, sounds familiar? Check this Auto Profits Trades out NOW: It doesn’t matter if you have experience or not. It doesn’t matter if you have formal education or not. It doesn’t matter if you have specialized equipment or not. The new Auto Profits Trades software is 100% WORK! 100% Proven & 100% Tested. This is not another “beta” binary option software. This is the Auto Profits Trades REAL DEAL! The Auto Profits Trades Software is programmed to trade only when it NOWS it’s going to win! Follow the link below (please do not share it, this is only for you): Just looking out for you. After 3 long years – it’s here! $500k THIS YEAR? $500,000 This Year? You must open this! 100% Guaranteed! Check it out NOW. After 3 long years, the Auto Profits Trades moment is here… …There aren’t many email’s that I am actually EXCITED to write. But what’s happening today: A New Software is launching today – “Auto Profits Trades”. The Auto Profits Trades best part is that software has been developed for 3 YEARS, and it’s 100% Tested, 100% Proven & 100% Guaranteed to make you money! —————————————————– 1,000 PEOPLE CAN’T BE WRONG —————————————————- Let’s keep it real, You are NOT going to make million dollars tonight, or this Auto Profits Trades month. However, You are going to do at least $500,000 this year, and this Auto Profits Trades is a low goal achievable by anyone who following the system! Check it out, it’s FREE: [ALERT] $100,000 A Month.. [URGENT] $2,570 in ONE DAY. This honestly NEVER happens (I swear) I’m not someone who gets ‘impressed’ easily… Is in a whole other league, if you’re talking about making a quick easy buck, TODAY, this it IT. 100% Guaranteed Binary Option Bot! NO B.S! Did you see this? BOOM! this actually works… I have something SPECIAL today! Follow this Auto Profits Trades link to get access to the Auto Profits Trades Software for FREE. The Auto Profits Trades Software is the ONLY bot that actually works! And here’s why, The “Auto Profits Trades” software ONLY trades when it KNOWS with absolute certainty it’s going to win. We have 100’s of reviews and testimonials of REAL people that make money with this. The Auto Profits Trades software is 100% verified by all brokers and 100% proven. Now, here’s what you don’t need to use this system: [x] Sit and stare at your PC for hours [x] Push pointless buttons time and time again [x] Invest large sums of money [x] Spend weeks or months on confusing training [x] Or learn some confusing, overwhelming software Forget about everything you tried and follow the Auto Profits Trades link to get access: And last but not least… WHY there is no doubt that this binary software works, and forces you to profit! (No faked income screenshots… promise!) I had my doubts before, but this will surprise you! Watch the video. It’s the most honest take I have ever seen. :) PS. Click the Auto Profits Trades link and watch it… you will be shocked! It`s genuinely different! How about partner-up? Self made multi-millionaire trade for you! Let’s do it together! Greatest opportunity of 2015! What if you had access to a self made MULTI-MILLIONAIRE who made all of his fortune with Binary Option? You know what? What if this guy and his team could TRADE FOR YOU? What if he could WORK FOR YOU and you will make money together? Meet David H. Brown! David and his team developed an Auto-Trading-Software that programmed to trade ONLY when it KNOWS with absolute certainty that a trade WILL make big money profits for you. There’s is limited spots for this Auto Profits Trades one, check it out fast: Click Here To Claim Your Fortune Trader LIFETIME User License!! Tags: Auto Profits Trades app, Auto Profits Trades information, Auto Profits Trades url, Auto Profits Trades website, Auto Profits Trades youtube video, Auto Profits Trades trading software, get Auto Profits Trades, article about Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades computer program, Auto Profits Trades the truth, Auto Profits Trades support, Auto Profits Trades support email address, Auto Profits Trades help desk, similar than Auto Profits Trades, better than Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades contact, Auto Profits Trades demo, Auto Profits Trades video tutorial, how does Auto Profits Trades work, is Auto Profits Trades the best online is Auto Profits Trades a scam, does Auto Profits Trades really work, does Auto Profits Trades actually work, Auto Profits Trades members area, Auto Profits Trades login page, Auto Profits Trades verification, Auto Profits Trades software reviews, Auto Profits Trades no fake review, Auto Profits Trades Live Broadcast, is Auto Profits Trades real, Auto Profits Trades forex trading, Auto Profits Trades binary options trading, Auto Profits Trades automated app, the Auto Profits Trades review, Auto Profits Trades signals, Auto Profits Trades mac os x, Auto Profits Trades broker sign up, Auto Profits Trades free download, reviews of Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades bonus, Auto Profits Trades honest review, Auto Profits Trades 2015, is Auto Profits Trades worth the risk, Auto Profits Trades pc desktop, Auto Profits Trades free trial, Auto Profits Trades testimonial, Auto Profits Trades scam watch dog, Auto Profits Trades warrior forum, Auto Profits Trades web version, Auto Profits Trades open a account, Auto Profits Trades laptop, Auto Profits Trades revised Method 2015, Auto Profits Trades Unbiased review, is Auto Profits Trades al hype?, Auto Profits Trades discount, Auto Profits Trades binary option watch dog review, Auto Profits Trades youtube, seriously will Auto Profits Trades work, Auto Profits Trades facebook, Auto Profits Trades activation code, Auto Profits Trades 2015 Working, Auto Profits Trades twitter, Auto Profits Trades currency trading, Auto Profits Trades real person review, Auto Profits Trades example trade, will Auto Profits Trades work on mobile phone, Completely New Auto Profits Trades, new Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades webinar, Auto Profits Trades anybody using this, Auto Profits Trades real or fake, is Auto Profits Trades live trades real, Auto Profits Trades honest reviews, Auto Profits Trades is it a scam, Auto Profits Trades download software, Auto Profits Trades software download, Auto Profits Trades forum, Auto Profits Trades signals, Auto Profits Trades download page, Auto Profits Trades software demo somebody using it, Auto Profits Trades binary software, Auto Profits Trades binary options review, Auto Profits Trades reviews, Auto Profits Trades binary today, Auto Profits Trades pro review, Auto Profits Trades windows 7, Auto Profits Trades windows 8 and windows XP, Auto Profits Trades price, is Auto Profits Trades a scam or not,will Auto Profits Trades help me, real truth about Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades System, Auto Profits Trades inside members page, how to download Auto Profits Trades, how to access Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades Robot, how to use Auto Profits Trades, how to trade with Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades NEWS Update and details, Auto Profits Trades today, Auto Profits Trades feedback, Auto Profits Trades real user review, Auto Profits Trades customer reviews, Auto Profits Trades consumer review, Auto Profits Trades Review 2015 Auto Profits Trades doesn't work, is Auto Profits Trades another scam or legit, Auto Profits Trades refund, Activate Auto Profits Trades, review of Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades test, Auto Profits Trades explanation, what is Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades news, new version of Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades fan Page, Auto Profits Trades breaking news, Auto Profits Trades Register, Auto Profits Trades sign up, Auto Profits Trades broker sign up, should i use Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades yes or no, do i need trading experience, Auto Profits Trades create account, Auto Profits Trades instructions, Auto Profits Trades Secret method, Join Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades ea trading app, Auto Profits Trades limited time, Auto Profits Trades pros and cons, Auto Profits Trades bad reviews, Auto Profits Trades negative and positive review, Auto Profits Trades Author, Auto Profits Trades creator, who made Auto Profits Trades, what is the Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades real review, Auto Profits Trades broker, Auto Profits Trades sign up broker, Auto Profits Trades sign up broker review, Auto Profits Trades fund broker, Auto Profits Trades how to fund broker,Auto Profits Trades deposit into broker, how does Auto Profits Trades trade, Auto Profits Trades strategy, Auto Profits Trades password reset, Auto Profits Trades beta tester, Auto Profits Trades comparison, Auto Profits Trades questions and answers, Auto Profits Trades By Nick Review,Auto Profits Trades By Nick Reviews, binaryhijack.com review, binaryhijack.com reviews, Auto Profits Trades results, Auto Profits Trades winning and losing trades, Auto Profits Trades overview, Auto Profits Trades training, how to setup Auto Profits Trades, start trading with Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades proof, Auto Profits Trades the truth, Get Auto Profits Trades, Auto Profits Trades Review Click Here To Claim Your Fortune Trader LIFETIME User License!!
It's that time of year again, and we've got a new version of macOS on our hands! This year we've finally jumped off the 10.xx naming scheme and now going to 11! And with that, a lot has changed under the hood in macOS. As with previous years, we'll be going over what's changed in macOS and what you should be aware of as a macOS and Hackintosh enthusiast.
Has Nvidia Support finally arrived?
What has changed on the surface
A whole new iOS-like UI
Broken Kexts in Big Sur
What has changed under the hood
New Kernel cache system: KernelCollections!
New Kernel Requirements
Secure Boot Changes
No more symbols required
Broken Kexts in Big Sur
MSI Navi installer Bug Resolved
New AMD OS X Kernel Patches
Other notable Hackintosh issues
Several SMBIOS have been dropped
Extra long install process
X79 and X99 Boot issues
New RTC requirements
Legacy GPU Patches currently unavailable
What’s new in the Hackintosh scene?
Dortania: a new organization has appeared
Dortania's Build Repo
True legacy macOS Support!
Intel Wireless: More native than ever!
Clover's revival? A frankenstein of a bootloader
Death of x86 and the future of Hackintoshing
Getting ready for macOS 11, Big Sur
Has Nvidia Support finally arrived?
Sadly every year I have to answer the obligatory question, no there is no new Nvidia support. Currently Nvidia's Kepler line is the only natively supported gen. However macOS 11 makes some interesting changes to the boot process, specifically moving GPU drivers into stage 2 of booting. Why this is relevant is due to Apple's initial reason for killing off Web Drivers: Secure boot. What I mean is that secure boot cannot work with Nvidia's Web Drivers due to how early Nvidia's drivers have to initialize at, and thus Apple refused to sign the binaries. With Big Sur, there could be 3rd party GPUs however the chances are still super slim but slightly higher than with 10.14 and 10.15.
What has changed on the surface
A whole new iOS-like UI
Love it or hate it, we've got a new UI more reminiscent of iOS 14 with hints of skeuomorphism(A somewhat subtle call back to previous mac UIs which have neat details in the icons) You can check out Apple's site to get a better idea:
A feature initially baked into APFS back in 2017 with the release of macOS 10.13, High Sierra, now macOS's main System volume has become both read-only and snapshotted. What this means is:
3rd parties have a much more difficult time modifying the system volume, allowing for greater security
OS updates can now be installed while you're using the OS, similar to how iOS handles updates
Time Machine can now more easily perform backups, without file inconsistencies with HFS Plus while you were using the machines
However there are a few things to note with this new enforcement of snapshotting:
OS snapshots are not calculated as used space, instead being labeled as purgeable space
Disabling macOS snapshots for the root volume with break software updates, and can corrupt data if one is applied
What has changed under the hood
Quite a few things actually! Both in good and bad ways unfortunately.
New Kernel Cache system: KernelCollections!
So for the past 15 years, macOS has been using the Prelinked Kernel as a form of Kernel and Kext caching. And with macOS Big Sur's new Read-only, snapshot based system volume, a new version of caching has be developed: KernelCollections! How this differs to previous OSes:
Kexts can no longer be hot-loaded, instead requiring a reboot to load with kmutil
OS Snapshots are now verified on each boot to ensure no system volume modifications occurred
apfs.kext and AppleImage4.kext verify the integrity of these snapshots
While technically these security features are optional and can be disabled after installation, many features including OS updates will no longer work reliably once disabled. This is due to the heavy reliance of snapshots for OS updates, as mentioned above and so we highly encourage all users to ensure at minimum SecureBootModel is set to Default or higher.
Note: ApECID is not required for functionality, and can be skipped if so desired.
Note 2: OpenCore 0.6.3 or newer is required for Secure Boot in Big Sur.
No more symbols required
This point is the most important part, as this is what we use for kext injection in OpenCore. Currently Apple has left symbols in place seemingly for debugging purposes however this is a bit worrying as Apple could outright remove symbols in later versions of macOS. But for Big Sur's cycle, we'll be good on that end however we'll be keeping an eye on future releases of macOS.
New Kernel Requirements
With this update, the AvoidRuntimeDefrag Booter quirk in OpenCore broke. Because of this, the macOS kernel will fall flat when trying to boot. Reason for this is due to cpu_count_enabled_logical_processors requiring the MADT (APIC) table, and so OpenCore will now ensure this table is made accessible to the kernel. Users will however need a build of OpenCore 0.6.0 with commit bb12f5for newer to resolve this issue. Additionally, both Kernel Allocation requirements and Secure Boot have also broken with Big Sur due to the new caching system discussed above. Thankfully these have also been resolved in OpenCore 0.6.3. To check your OpenCore version, run the following in terminal: nvram 4D1FDA02-38C7-4A6A-9CC6-4BCCA8B30102:opencore-version If you're not up-to-date and running OpenCore 0.6.3+, see here on how to upgrade OpenCore: Updating OpenCore, Kexts and macOS
Broken Kexts in Big Sur
Unfortunately with the aforementioned KernelCollections, some kexts have unfortunately broken or have been hindered in some way. The main kexts that currently have issues are anything relying on Lilu's userspace patching functionality:
Big Sur dropped a few Ivy Bridge and Haswell based SMBIOS from macOS, so see below that yours wasn't dropped:
iMac14,3 and older
Note iMac14,4 is still supported
MacPro5,1 and older
MacMini6,x and older
MacBook7,1 and older
MacBookAir5,x and older
MacBookPro10,x and older
If your SMBIOS was supported in Catalina and isn't included above, you're good to go! We also have a more in-depth page here: Choosing the right SMBIOS For those wanting a simple translation for their Ivy and Haswell Machines:
iMac13,1 should transition over to using iMac14,4
iMac13,2 should transition over to using iMac15,1
iMac14,2 and iMac14,3 should transition over to using iMac15,1
Note: AMD CPUs users should transition over to MacPro7,1
iMac14,1 should transition over to iMac14,4
Currently only certain hardware has been officially dropped:
"Official" Consumer Ivy Bridge Support(U, H and S series)
These CPUs will still boot without much issue, but note that no Macs are supported with consumer Ivy Bridge in Big Sur.
Ivy Bridge-E CPUs are still supported thanks to being in MacPro6,1
Ivy Bridge iGPUs slated for removal
HD 4000 and HD 2500, however currently these drivers are still present in 11.0.1
Similar to Mojave and Nvidia's Tesla drivers, we expect Apple to forget about them and only remove them in the next major OS update next year
Due to the new snapshot-based OS, installation now takes some extra time with sealing. If you get stuck at Forcing CS_RUNTIME for entitlement, do not shutdown. This will corrupt your install and break the sealing process, so please be patient.
X79 and X99 Boot issues
With Big Sur, IOPCIFamily went through a decent rewriting causing many X79 and X99 boards to fail to boot as well as panic on IOPCIFamily. To resolve this issue, you'll need to disable the unused uncore bridge:
With macOS Big Sur, AppleRTC has become much more picky on making sure your OEM correctly mapped the RTC regions in your ACPI tables. This is mainly relevant on Intel's HEDT series boards, I documented how to patch said RTC regions in OpenCorePkg:
For those having boot issues on X99 and X299, this section is super important; you'll likely get stuck at PCI Configuration Begin. You can also find prebuilts here for those who do not wish to compile the file themselves:
For some reason, Apple removed the AppleIntelPchSeriesAHCI class from AppleAHCIPort.kext. Due to the outright removal of the class, trying to spoof to another ID (generally done by SATA-unsupported.kext) can fail for many and create instability for others. * A partial fix is to block Big Sur's AppleAHCIPort.kext and inject Catalina's version with any conflicting symbols being patched. You can find a sample kext here: Catalina's patched AppleAHCIPort.kext * This will work in both Catalina and Big Sur so you can remove SATA-unsupported if you want. However we recommend setting the MinKernel value to 20.0.0 to avoid any potential issues.
Legacy GPU Patches currently unavailable
Due to major changes in many frameworks around GPUs, those using ASentientBot's legacy GPU patches are currently out of luck. We either recommend users with these older GPUs stay on Catalina until further developments arise or buy an officially supported GPU
What’s new in the Hackintosh scene?
Dortania: a new organization has appeared
As many of you have probably noticed, a new organization focusing on documenting the hackintoshing process has appeared. Originally under my alias, Khronokernel, I started to transition my guides over to this new family as a way to concentrate the vast amount of information around Hackintoshes to both ease users and give a single trusted source for information. We work quite closely with the community and developers to ensure information's correct, up-to-date and of the best standards. While not perfect in every way, we hope to be the go-to resource for reliable Hackintosh information. And for the times our information is either outdated, missing context or generally needs improving, we have our bug tracker to allow the community to more easily bring attention to issues and speak directly with the authors:
Kexts here are built right after commit, and currently supports most of Acidanthera's kexts and some 3rd party devs as well. If you'd like to add support for more kexts, feel free to PR: Build Repo source
True legacy macOS Support!
As of OpenCore's latest versioning, 0.6.2, you can now boot every version of x86-based builds of OS X/macOS! A huge achievement on @Goldfish64's part, we now support every major version of kernel cache both 32 and 64-bit wise. This means machines like Yonah and newer should work great with OpenCore and you can even relive the old days of OS X like OS X 10.4! And Dortania guides have been updated accordingly to accommodate for builds of those eras, we hope you get as much enjoyment going back as we did working on this project!
Intel Wireless: More native than ever!
Another amazing step forward in the Hackintosh community, near-native Intel Wifi support! Thanks to the endless work on many contributors of the OpenIntelWireless project, we can now use Apple's built-in IO80211 framework to have near identical support to those of Broadcom wireless cards including features like network access in recovery and control center support. For more info on the developments, please see the itlwm project on GitHub: itlwm
Note, native support requires the AirportItlwm.kext and SecureBootModel enabled on OpenCore. Alternatively you can force IO80211Family.kext to ensure AirportItlwm works correctly.
Airdrop support currently is also not implemented, however is actively being worked on.
Clover's revival? A frankestien of a bootloader
As many in the community have seen, a new bootloader popped up back in April of 2019 called OpenCore. This bootloader was made by the same people behind projects such as Lilu, WhateverGreen, AppleALC and many other extremely important utilities for both the Mac and Hackintosh community. OpenCore's design had been properly thought out with security auditing and proper road mapping laid down, it was clear that this was to be the next stage of hackintoshing for the years we have left with x86. And now lets bring this back to the old crowd favorite, Clover. Clover has been having a rough time of recent both with the community and stability wise, with many devs jumping ship to OpenCore and Clover's stability breaking more and more with C++ rewrites, it was clear Clover was on its last legs. Interestingly enough, the community didn't want Clover to die, similarly to how Chameleon lived on through Enoch. And thus, we now have the Clover OpenCore integration project(Now merged into Master with r5123+). The goal is to combine OpenCore into Clover allowing the project to live a bit longer, as Clover's current state can no longer boot macOS Big Sur or older versions of OS X such as 10.6. As of writing, this project seems to be a bit confusing as there seems to be little reason to actually support Clover. Many of Clover's properties have feature-parity in OpenCore and trying to combine both C++ and C ruins many of the features and benefits either languages provide. The main feature OpenCore does not support is macOS-only ACPI injection, however the reasoning is covered here: Does OpenCore always inject SMBIOS and ACPI data into other OSes?
Death of x86 and the future of Hackintoshing
With macOS Big Sur, a big turning point is about to happen with Apple and their Macs. As we know it, Apple will be shifting to in-house designed Apple Silicon Macs(Really just ARM) and thus x86 machines will slowly be phased out of their lineup within 2 years. What does this mean for both x86 based Macs and Hackintoshing in general? Well we can expect about 5 years of proper OS support for the iMac20,x series which released earlier this year with an extra 2 years of security updates. After this, Apple will most likely stop shipping x86 builds of macOS and hackintoshing as we know it will have passed away. For those still in denial and hope something like ARM Hackintoshes will arrive, please consider the following:
We have yet to see a true iPhone "Hackintosh" and thus the likely hood of an ARM Hackintosh is unlikely as well
There have been successful attempts to get the iOS kernel running in virtual machines, however much work is still to be done
Apple's use of "Apple Silicon" hints that ARM is not actually what future Macs will be running, instead we'll see highly customized chips based off ARM
For example, Apple will be heavily relying on hardware features such as WX, kernel memory protection, Pointer Auth, etc for security and thus both macOS and Applications will be dependant on it. This means hackintoshing on bare-metal(without a VM) will become extremely difficult without copious amounts of work
Also keep in mind Apple Silicon will no longer be UEFI-based like Intel Macs currently are, meaning a huge amount of work would also be required on this end as well
So while we may be heart broken the journey is coming to a stop in the somewhat near future, hackintoshing will still be a time piece in Apple's history. So enjoy it now while we still can, and we here at Dortania will still continue supporting the community with our guides till the very end!
Getting ready for macOS 11, Big Sur
This will be your short run down if you skipped the above:
Lilu's userspace patcher is broken
Due to this many kexts will break:
WhateverGreen's DRM and -cdfon patches
Many Ivy Bridge and Haswell SMBIOS were dropped
See above for what SMBIOS to choose
Ivy Bridge iGPUs are to be dropped
Currently in 11.0.1, these drivers are still present
For the last 2, see here on how to update: Updating OpenCore, Kexts and macOS In regards to downloading Big Sur, currently gibMacOS in macOS or Apple's own software updater are the most reliable methods for grabbing the installer. Windows and Linux support is still unknown so please stand by as we continue to look into this situation, macrecovery.py may be more reliable if you require the recovery package. And as with every year, the first few weeks to months of a new OS release are painful in the community. We highly advise users to stay away from Big Sur for first time installers. The reason is that we cannot determine whether issues are Apple related or with your specific machine, so it's best to install and debug a machine on a known working OS before testing out the new and shiny. For more in-depth troubleshooting with Big Sur, see here: OpenCore and macOS 11: Big Sur
RESULTS of the State of the Game Survey: September 2020
Hi all, It’s time for the results! Thank you to everyone who took the time to respond - we had over 1,750 responses, which is great! These insights wouldn’t be possible without your time and support. As always, neither myself nor this survey are associated with Intelligent Systems or Nintendo in any way. Please direct feedback about the game itself to the official channels. Now let’s get into it!
PreviousSurveyResults: April_2020_State_of_the_Game_Survey ~ Demographics ~ 53.8% began playing FE:H in February 2017, with 20.0% more joining during the first year of the game. 12.0% of respondents joined during the second year, 8.7% joined during the third, and 4.0% joined during the fourth year (the last ~7 months). The age range breakdown of respondents is as follows:
(2.6%) 12 – 15 years old
(15.0 %) 16 – 18 years old
(23.4 %) 19 – 21 years old
(21.8 %) 22 – 24 years old
(25.8 %) 25 – 30 years old
(8.2 %) 31 – 40 years old
(1.0 %) 40+ years old
75.8% of respondents identified as Male, 18.4% as Female, and 3.0% as Non-binary. 24.6% of respondents have never missed a daily login, while a further 38.8% have missed less than a month’s worth of logins, 11.7% missed 1-2 months, 9.9% missed 3-6 months, 5.8% missed 7-12 months, and 4.7% missed over a year’s worth. 33.5% report being F2P, while 28.7% have spent less than $100, 18.3% spent between $100 - $499, 7.3% spent between $500 - $999, and 8.7% have spent over $1000. 46.6% last spent money on FE:H during the fourth year of the game (the last 3 months), while 6.6% last spent money during the third year of the game, 5.8% last spent during the second year of the game, and 5.1% last spent money during the first year of the game. ~ Summoning ~ “Which of the following banners have you used orbs on at least once?”
~ Summoning Mechanics ~ 33.7% spent orbs on the Hero Fest banner AFTER Intelligent Systems announced how they would be compensating players for the Hero Fest banner glitch, compared to 61.7% who did not. 30.5% say that knowing about the compensation for the Hero Fest banner glitch caused them to spend more orbs on the banner than they would have otherwise, compared to 41.5% who say it did not. 28.0% did not spend orbs on the Hero Fest banner. 34.3% feel positively or very positively about the quality of 4* focuses on regular banners, compared to 26.9% who feel negatively or very negatively. 69.7% feel positively or very positively about the quality of 4* focuses on seasonal banners, compared to 7.8% who feel negatively or very negatively. 53.8% report that the system guaranteeing a free 5* after 40 summons generally makes them summon more, while 5.4% report that it generally makes them summon less and 36.1% report no change in their summoning habits on New Heroes banners. “If all New Heroes Banners used the permanent 40-summons-for-a-guaranteed-5* system that CYL4 used, how would your orb-spending habits on New Heroes banners change?”
(1.8%) I would spend fewer orbs than I did before
(22.3%) I would spend the same amount of orbs I usually do
(10.3%) I would spend more orbs than I did before
(62.2%) My spending would depend more on the Heroes offered
~ Choose Your Legends IV ~ “Which CYL4 Brave Heroes have you summoned, whether from the guaranteed choice banner or the regular banner?”
Of the summoning milestones on the CYL4 banner:
(20.2%) did not reach any of these summoning milestones
(79.7%) reached 40 summons
(41.0%) reached 80 summons
(19.8%) reached 120 summons
(11.1%) reached 160 summons
45.7% say that the free 5* hero at 40, 80, 120 and 160 summons caused them to spend more on CYL4 than they would have otherwise, while 50.3% say it did not. 22.8% say that the potential use of a new Brave Hero in future F2P Guides for content such as Hero Battles influenced their Brave Heroes summons, compared to 74.0% who say it did not. “If you could only get ONE of the new Brave Heroes, which one would you choose?”
“Which Brave Hero do you believe is the overall strongest?”
“Which Brave Hero do you believe is the overall weakest?”
“Which Brave Hero do you believe has the best art?”
“Which set of Brave Heroes is your favorite overall?”
23.6% feel positively or very positively about the addition of Jorge as the CYL4 GHB hero, compared to 33.0% who feel negatively or very negatively. 86.3% believe CYL5 should add further protections against vote botting, compared to 4.4% who do not. 70.1% believe CYL5 should require Nintendo Account sign-in to vote, compared to 12.6% who do not. ~ Feh Pass and Resplendent Heroes ~ 41.2% feel negatively about the addition of the Feh Pass (down 15.8% from the last survey), compared to 11.6% who feel positively (up 1.5% from the last survey). 46.1% are neutral (up 14.3% from the last survey). 40.2% have purchased the Feh Pass, compared to 59.8% who have not. This is a 9.5% increase compared to the last survey, following a 6.7% increase before that. Of those who have subscribed to Feh Pass, 17.4% have purchased Resplendent Heroes separately (up 12.9% from the last survey), compared to 82.6% who have not. “Which Resplendent Hero has your favorite art?”
“Which Resplendent outfit theme is your favorite?”
~ Miscellaneous ~ 15.8% feel positively about the introduction of Harmonized Heroes, compared to 31.3% who feel negatively. 29.5% have a Harmonized Hero, compared to 70.1% who do not. 14.6% feel positively or very positively about the Resonant Battles game mode, compared to 51.5% who feel negatively or very negatively. 4.6% say that the Resonant Battles game mode influenced them to pull for Harmonized Heroes, compared to 94.5% who say it has not. 34.8% believe the new Arena maps are better than the maps they replaced, while 7.4% believe they are worse, and 36.7% believe they are about the same. “How often do you use Auto Dispatch in Aether Raids?”
(34.3%) All of them, always
(0.2%) All of them, in Light Season
(3.6%) All of them, in Astra season
(24.3%) Only sometimes
(37.6%) I never use it
“IV Mango” is the preferred term for Trait Fruit according to 32.2% of respondents, followed by “IVcado” at 28.9%, “Fruit” at 7.6%, and “Dragonfruit” at 6.6%. The remaining 24.7% prefer to just call them Trait Fruit. 39.3% say they will use their first Trait Fruits on a Heroic Grails unit, while 32.9% say they will use them on a Summonable unit, and 1.3% say they will use them on an Askr unit. 58.7% prefer Stat Boosts for Legendary Heroes, compared to 26.3% who prefer Pair-Up. 56.5% generally prefer Regular Duo Heroes, compared to 8.8% who prefer Harmonized Duo Heroes. 1.8% say that the update that raised the minimum hardware/software required to play the game affected their ability to play FE:H, compared to 95.8% who say it did not. ~ Recurring Miscellaneous ~ “Which game do you want a New Heroes banner from the most?”
(26.0%) Three Houses (-1.9%)
(9.7%) Radiant Dawn (+0.5%)
(7.7%) Sacred Stones (+0.2%)
(7.5%) Awakening (-3.1%)
(6.4%) Genealogy of the Holy War (-1.3%)
(6.1%) Path of Radiance (-0.9%)
(6.0%) Gaiden / Shadows of Valentia (+2.7%)
(5.9%) TMS #FE (+1.9%)
(5.4%) Blazing Blade (+1.3%)
(5.0%) Fates (+1.0%)
(4.2%) Thracia 776 (+0.8%)
(2.4%) Binding Blade (+0.6%)
(0.8%) Shadow Dragon and the Blade of Light / Shadow Dragon (-1.0%)
(0.8%) Mystery of the Emblem / New Mystery of the Emblem (-1.1%)
“How much do you care about your rank in the following modes?”
(2.90/5.00 average) Arena
(2.82/5.00 average) Aether Raids
(2.48/5.00 average) PvE game modes with player ranking boards
(1.82/5.00 average) Arena Assault
“How have recent changes to FE:H changed your opinion on the game as a whole?”
(39.3%) My opinion was positive and has stayed positive
(5.7%) My opinion used to be negative, but has turned positive
(9.9%) My opinion used to be positive, but has turned negative
(5.1%) My opinion was negative and has stayed negative
~ Intelligent Systems Approval Ratings ~ The approval ratings are calculated by the proportion of Approve responses compared to the number of both Approve and Disapprove responses. Percent who approve of the way Intelligent Systems is handling:
74.6% - The addition of new heroes / characters to the game (+11.9)
69.4% - The gacha mechanics and summoning banners (+5.5)
59.2% - The story/plot (+9.4)
85.2% - Unranked PvE game modes (Hero Battles, Forging Bonds, Tactics Drills, Lost Lore, Hall of Forms) (-1.2)
50.7% - Ranked PvE game modes (Voting Gauntlets, Tempest Trials, Grand Conquest, Allegiance Battles, Rokkr Sieges, Mjolnir's Strike) (-2.6)
34.6% - Arena (-6.2)
48.0% - Arena Assault (+6.7)
45.8% - Aether Raids (+12.7)
40.5% believe Intelligent Systems cares about its Free to Play userbase (up 10.1% from the last survey), while 34.7% do not. This continues the upward trend from the previous survey, bringing us to 8.8% down from where we were before the February drop). 42.9% approve of the way Intelligent Systems is handling Fire Emblem: Heroes as a whole (up 14.8% from the last survey), while 16.9% disapprove. This continues the upward trend from the previous survey, bringing us to only 2.5% down from where we were before the February drop).
A NOTE ABOUT METHODOLOGY: The overall approval ratings question above has traditionally been the exact percent of Approve responses, as a proportion with both Neutral and Disapprove responses. Note that this is different than the way approval is calculated for individual modes (the proportion of Approve responses compared to the number of both Approve and Disapprove responses), where Neutral responses are excluded. The difference in calculation has continued this way in order to maintain comparability with previous survey results. For comparisons sake, the overall approval rating trend going by raw Approval percentage over the last 4 surveys is: 50.6% (Dec) -> 22.9% (Feb) -> 28.1% (Apr) -> 42.9% (Sept) Whereas the overall approval rating trend going by proportion of Approve/Disapprove with the Neutrals excluded over the last 4 surveys is: 82.2% (Dec) -> 41.0% (Feb) -> 51.3% (Apr) -> 71.7% (Sept).
~ Bonus Questions ~ “Who is your Favorite Hero added since the last survey?”
Dimitri (Brave) is the winner, followed by Edelgard (Brave), then Claude (Brave).
“What would be the best Harmonized Hero (a pair of two heroes from different games) and why?”: Rather than selecting a subset of responses this time, the link below is to a google sheet of almost all unique responses. I cleaned it up a little bit to remove “idk” type answers, duplicates, and partial string duplicates, so don’t worry if you don’t see your exact response in it. [Full Responses]. ~ Feedback ~ As always, I received lots of great feedback, both in your survey responses and in the thread itself. A heartfelt thank you to all participants for your encouragements and criticisms - these surveys wouldn’t be where they are without your feedback. But it’s not all serious; feedback messages also included:
“There once was a CYL4 banner / That hit my orbs hard like a hammer / The very next day / FloomMom Duo came our way / Now I'm stuck bartering with a loan planner”
“bonk, go to survey jail”
“Am I also allowed to put in "Norne and Azura" for a Harmonized Hero pair? No reason.”
“Brace yourself. Winter (armours) are coming!” “Brave Hector's refine has made me so very happy with it's inclusion. Go shove your bow up your butt Legendary Chrom.”
“Give me villager alts or give me death”
“I expect the next survey to come with +12 to attack, null follow up, and special cooldown reduction.”
“The true best Harmonized Hero would be Azura and Roy since it would make me uninstall the game and never want to play a gacha ever again”
“My headcanon for the dream storyline is that the evil fairies have the Summoner off picking up pebbles that look like orbs. Fredrickson would be proud.”
“Where's the most wanted unit to add to the game question so I can shout my want for Seteth into the void?”
“I no longer dab, for Legendary Seliph has finally appeared.”
And greetings from Argentina, the Bahamas, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Russia, South Korea, Sweden, the UK, Vietnam, the Pacific Northwest, Alaska, Toronto, and St. Louis, as well as from many fictional locations!
And some personal/meta comments:
“Any chance we end up seeing another Super Serious Survey in the not-so-distant future?” -> I could not believe it’s been over a year since the last one! We’ll have to do one soon!
“Feels like the end of an era, not having to count all my five stars” -> I know, right? I may have it return in a side survey for the most hardcore of respondents at some point, since some people are asking about it and it would be good to get data on it every once in a while.
“I was looking through your Nornes skills and saw you haven't given her live for bounty yet! It's the best skill for her, what are you doing!?” -> I am a fraud :( I have given her Live for Honor though :P
“What do you hope for in FEH?” -> Norne alt, Resplendent Jaffar, and Shamir
Multiple people mentioned that they had returned after a long break and were surprised to see Norne instead of Azura! Welcome back!
I also missed a bunch of other possible Trait Fruit nicknames, which I knew would inevitably happen. Sorry!
Note: Please don’t ask me to feature your feedback comment; it’s the only guaranteed way to not have your comment added! Finally, the suggestion to have separate options for serious vs non-serious feedback was a good idea, I’ll try that out on the next survey! ~ Closing Remarks ~ If you missed out on responding to this survey when it was available, consider subscribing to FEHSurveys. This subreddit serves as a place to organize FE:H-related surveys, make new releases more visible, and make it easier for users to see when surveys are active. Thanks again to everyone who participated! I hope you find the results interesting, and if there’s anything else you think can be discovered from the data, let me know and I’ll do my best to oblige!
The Challenges of Designing a Modern Skill, Part 3
Okay, Wendy’s or Walgreens or whoever, I don’t care who you are, you’re listening to the rest.
Introduction to Part 3
Welcome back one last time to “The Challenges of Designing a Modern Skill,” a series where we discuss all aspects of skill design and development. In Part 1, we talked about OSRS’s history with skills, and started the lengthy conversation on Skill Design Philosophy, including the concepts of Core, Expansion, and Integration. This latter topic consumed the entirety of Part 2 as well, which covered Rewards and Motivations, Progression, Buyables, as well as Unconstructive Arguments. Which brings us to today, the final part of our discussion. In this Part 3, we’ll finish up Section 3 – Skill Design Philosophy, then move on to chat about the design and blog process. One last time, this discussion was intended to be a single post, but its length outgrew the post character limit twice. Therefore, it may be important to look at the previous two parts for clarity and context with certain terms. The final product, in its purest, aesthetic, and unbroken form, can be found here.
3-C – Skill Design Philosophy, Continued
3-12 - Balancing
What follows from the discussion about XP and costs, of course, is balancing: the bane of every developer. A company like Riot knows better than anyone that having too many factors to account for makes good balance impossible. Balancing new ideas appropriately is extremely challenging and requires a great respect for current content as discussed in Section 3-5 – Integration. Thankfully, in OSRS we only have three major balancing factors: Profit, XP Rate, and Intensity, and two minor factors: Risk and Leniency. These metrics must amount to some sense of balance (besides Leniency, which as we’ll see is the definition of anti-balance) in order for a piece of content to feel like it’s not breaking the system or rendering all your previous efforts meaningless. It’s also worthy to note that there is usually a skill-specific limit to the numerical values of these metrics. For example, Runecrafting will never receive a training method that grants 200k xp/hr, while for Construction that’s easily on the lower end of the scale. A basic model works better than words to describe these factors, and therefore, being the phenomenal artist that I am, I have constructed one, which I’ve dubbed “The Guthix Scale.” But I’ll be cruel and use words anyway.
Profit: how much you gain from a task, or how much you lose. Gain or loss can include resources, cosmetics, specialized currencies, good old gold pieces, or anything on that line.
XP Rate: how fast you gain XP.
Intensity: how much effort (click intensity), attention (reaction intensity), and thought (planning intensity) you need to put into the activity to perform it well.
Risk: how likely is the loss of your revenue and/or resource investment into the activity. Note that one must be careful with risk, as players are very good at abusing systems intended to encourage higher risk levels to minimize how much they’re actually risking.
Leniency: a measure for how imbalanced a piece of content can be before the public and/or Jagex nerfs it. Leniency serves as a simple modulator to help comprehend when the model breaks or bends in unnatural ways, and is usually determined by how enjoyable and abusable an activity is, such that players don’t want to cause an outrage over it. For example, Slayer has a high level of Leniency; people don’t mind that some Slayer tasks grant amazing XP Rates, great Profits, have middling Intensity, and low Risk. On the other hand, Runecrafting has low levels of Leniency; despite low Risk, many Runecrafting activities demand high Intensity for poor XP Rates and middling Profits.
In the end, don’t worry about applying specific numbers during the conceptual phase of your skill design. However, when describing an activity to your reader, it’s always useful if you give approximations, such as “high intensity” or “low risk,” so that they get an idea of the activity’s design goals as well as to guide the actual development of that activity. Don’t comment on the activity’s Leniency though, as that would be pretty pretentious and isn’t for you to determine anyway.
3-13 - Skill Bloat
What do the arts of weaving, tanning, sowing, spinning, pottery, glassmaking, jewellery, engraving, carving, chiselling, carpentry, and even painting have in common? In real life, there’s only so much crossover between these arts, but in Runescape they’re all simply Crafting. The distinction between what deserves to be its own skill or instead tagged along to a current skill is often arbitrary; this is the great challenge of skill bloat. The fundamental question for many skill concepts is: does this skill have enough depth to stand on its own? The developers of 2006 felt that there was sufficient depth in Construction to make it something separate from Crafting, even if the latter could have covered the former. While there’s often no clean cut between these skills (why does making birdhouses use Crafting instead of Construction?), it is easy to see that Construction has found its own solid niche that would’ve been much too big to act as yet another Expansion of Crafting. On the other hand, a skill with extremely limited scope and value perhaps should be thrown under the umbrella of a larger skill. Take Firemaking: it’s often asked why it deserves to be its own skill given how limited its uses are. This is one of those ideas that probably should have just been thrown under Crafting or even Woodcutting. But again, the developers who made early Runescape did not battle with the same ideas as the modern player; they simply felt like Firemaking was a good idea for a skill. Similarly, the number of topics that the Magic skill covers is so often broken down in other games, like Morrowind’s separation between Illusion, Conjuration, Alteration, Destruction, Mysticism, Restoration, Enchant, Alchemy (closer to Herblore), and Unarmored (closer to Strength and Defense). Why does Runescape not break Magic into more skills? The answer is simple: Magic was created with a much more limited scope in Runescape, and there has not been enough content in any specific magical category to justify another skill being born. But perhaps your skill concept seeks to address this; maybe your Enchantment skill takes the enchanting aspects of Magic away, expands the idea to include current imbues and newer content, and fully fleshes the idea out such that the Magic skill alone cannot contain it. Somewhat ironically, Magic used to be separated into Good and Evil Magic skills in Runescape Classic, but that is another topic. So instead of arguments about what could be thrown under another skill’s umbrella, perhaps we should be asking: is there enough substance to this skill concept for it to stand on its own, outside of its current skill categorization? Of course, this leads to a whole other debate about how much content is enough for a skill idea to deserve individuality, but that would get too deep into specifics and is outside the scope of this discussion.
3-14 - Skill Endgame
Runescape has always been a sandbox MMO, but the original Runescape experience was built more or less with a specific endgame in mind: killing players and monsters. Take the Runescape Classic of 2001: you had all your regular combat skills, but even every other skill had an endgame whose goal was helping combat out. Fishing, Firemaking, and Cooking would provide necessary healing. Smithing and Crafting, along with their associated Gathering skill partners, served to gear you up. Combat was the simple endgame and most mechanics existed to serve that end. However, since those first days, the changing endgame goals of players have promoted a vast expansion of the endgame goals of new content. For example, hitting a 99 in any non-combat skill is an endgame goal in itself for many players, completely separate from that skill’s combat relationship (if any). These goals have increased to aspects like cosmetic collections, pets, maxed stats, all quests completed, all diaries completed, all music tracks unlocked, a wealthy bank, the collection log, boss killcounts, and more. Whereas skills used to have a distinct part of a system that ultimately served combat, we now have a vast variety of endgame goals that a skill can be directed towards. You can even see a growth in this perspective as new skills were released up to 2007: Thieving mainly nets you valuable (or once valuable) items which have extremely flexible uses, and Construction has a strong emphasis on cosmetics for your POH. So when designing your new skill, contemplate what the endgame of your skill looks like. For example, if you are proposing a Gathering skill, what is the Production skill tie-in, and what is the endgame goal of that Production skill? Maybe your new skill Spelunking has an endgame in gathering rare collectibles that can be shown off in your POH. Maybe your new skill Necromancy functions like a Support skill, giving you followers that help speed along resource gathering, and letting you move faster to the endgame goal of the respective Production skill. Whatever it is, a proper, clear, and unified view of an endgame goal helps a skill feel like it serves a distinct and valuable purpose. Note that this could mean that you require multiple skills to be released simultaneously for each to feed into each other and form an appropriate endgame. In that case, go for it – don’t make it a repeat of RS3’s Divination, a Gathering skill left hanging without the appropriate Production skill partner of Invention for over 2 years. A good example of a skill with a direct endgame is… most of them. Combat is a well-accepted endgame, and traditionally, most skills are intended to lend a hand in combat whether by supplies or gear. A skill with a poor endgame would be Hunter: Hunter is so scattered in its ultimate endgame goals, trying to touch on small aspects of everything like combat gear, weight reduction, production, niche skilling tools, and food. There’s a very poor sense of identity to Hunter’s endgame, and it doesn’t help that very few of these rewards are actually viable or interesting in the current day. Similarly, while Slayer has a strong endgame goal it is terrible in its methodology, overshadowing other Production skills in their explicit purpose. A better design for Slayer’s endgame would have been to treat it as a secondary Gathering skill, to work almost like a catalyst for other Gathering-Production skill relationships. In this mindset, Slayer is where you gather valuable monster drops, combine it with traditional Gathering resources like ores from Mining, then use a Production skill like Smithing to meld them into the powerful gear that is present today. This would have kept other Gathering and Production skills at the forefront of their specialities, in contrast to today’s situation where Slayer will give fully assembled gear that’s better than anything you could receive from the appropriate skills (barring a few items that need a Production skill to piece together).
3-15 - Alternate Goals
From a game design perspective, skills are so far reaching that it can be tempting to use them to shift major game mechanics to a more favourable position. Construction is an example of this idea in action: Construction was very intentionally designed to be a massive gold sink to help a hyperinflating economy. Everything about it takes gold out of the game, whether through using a sawmill, buying expensive supplies from stores, adding rooms, or a shameless piece of furniture costing 100m that is skinned as, well, 100m on a shameless piece of furniture. If you’re clever about it, skills are a legitimately good opportunity for such change. Sure, the gold sink is definitely a controversial feature of Construction, but for the most part it’s organic and makes sense; fancy houses and fancy cosmetics are justifiably expensive. It is notable that the controversy over Construction’s gold sink mechanism is probably levied more against the cost of training, rather than the cost of all its wonderful aesthetics. Perhaps that should have been better accounted for in its design phase, but now it is quite set in stone. To emphasize that previous point: making large scale changes to the game through a new skill can work, but it must feel organic and secondary to the skill’s main purpose. Some people really disliked Warding because they felt it tried too hard to fix real, underlying game issues with mechanics that didn’t thematically fit or were overshadowing the skill’s Core. While this may or may not be true, if your new skill can improve the game’s integrity without sacrificing its own identity, you could avoid this argument entirely. If your skill Regency has a Core of managing global politics, but also happens to serve as a resource sink to help your failing citizens, then you’ve created a strong Core design while simultaneously improving the profitability of Gathering skills.
3-16 - The Combat No-Touch Rule
So, let’s take a moment to examine the great benefits and rationale of RS2’s Evolution of Combat: This space has been reserved for unintelligible squabbling. With that over, it’s obvious that the OSRS playerbase is not a big fan of making major changes to the combat system. If there’s anything that defines the OSRS experience, it has to be the janky and abusable combat system that we love. So, in the past 7 years of OSRS, how many times have you heard someone pitch a new combat skill? Practically no one ever has; a new combat skill, no matter how miniscule, would feel obtrusive to most players, and likely would not even receive 25% of votes in a poll. This goes right back to Section 3-5 – Integration, and the importance of preserving the fundamentals of OSRS’s design. I know that my intention with this discussion was to be as definitive about skill design as possible, and in that spirit I should be delving into the design philosophy specifically behind combat skills, but I simply don’t see the benefit of me trying, and the conversation really doesn’t interest me that much. It goes without saying that as expansive as this discussion is, it does not cover every facet of skill design, which is a limitation both of my capabilities and desire to do so.
3-17 - Aesthetics
I don’t do aesthetics well. I like them, I want them, but I do not understand them; there are others much better equipped to discuss this topic than I. Nonetheless, here we go. Since the dawn of OSRS, debates over art style and aesthetics have raged across Gielinor. After all, the OSRS Team is filled with modern day artists while OSRS is an ancient game. What were they supposed to do? Keep making dated graphics? Make content with a modernized and easily digestible style? Something in-between? While many players shouted for more dated graphics, they were approached by an interesting predicament: which dated graphics did they want? We had a great selection present right from the start of OSRS: 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. People hungry for nostalgia chose the era that they grew up in, leading to frequent requests for older models like the dragon or imp, most of which were denied by Jagex (except the old Mining rock models). But which era was OSRS supposed to follow? Jagex elected to carve their own path, but not without heavy criticism especially closer to OSRS’s conception. However, they adapted to player requests and have since gone back and fixed many of the blatant early offenders (like the Kingdom of Kourend) and adopted a more consistent flavour, one that generally respects the art style of 2007. Even though it doesn’t always hit the mark, one has to appreciate the OSRS artists for making their best attempt and listening to feedback, and here’s to hoping that their art style examination mentioned in June 2020’s Gazette bears fruit. But what exactly is the old school art style? There are simple systems by which most players judge it in OSRS, usually by asking questions like, “Would you believe if this existed in 2007?” More informed artists will start pointing out distinct features that permeated most content from back in the day, such as low quality textures, low poly models, low FPS animations, a “low fantasy” or grounded profile that appeals somewhat to realism, reducing cartoonish exaggerations, and keeping within the lore. Compiled with this, music and sound design help that art style come to life; it can be very hard on immersion when these don’t fit. An AGS would sound jarring if its special attack sounded like a weak dagger stab, and having to endure Country Jig while roaming Hosidius suddenly sweeps you off into a different universe. But coming back to skill design, the art, models, and sound design tend to be some of the last features, mostly because the design phase doesn’t demand such a complete picture of a skill. However, simple concept art and models can vastly improve how a skill concept is communicated and comfort players who are concerned about maintaining that “old school feel.” This will be touched on again later in this discussion under Section 5-2 – Presentation and Beta Testing.
3-18 - Afterword
Now we’ve set down the modern standards for a new skill, but the statements that started this section bear repeating: the formula we’ve established does not automatically make a good or interesting skill, as hard as we might have tried. Once again, harken back to the First Great Irony: that we are trying to inject the modern interpretation of what defines a skill upon a game that was not necessarily built to contain it. Therefore, one could just as easily deny each of the components described above, as popular or unpopular as the act might be, and their opinion could be equally valid and all this effort meaningless. Don’t take these guidelines with such stringency as to disregard all other views.
5-0 - The OSRS Team and the Design Process
If you’ve followed me all the way here, you’re likely A) exhausted and fed up of any conversation concerning new skills, or B) excited, because you’ve just struck an incredible skill idea (or perhaps one that’s always hung around your head) that happens to tick off all the above checkboxes. But unfortunately for you B types, it’s about to get pretty grim, because we’re going to go through every aspect of skill design that’s exterior to the game itself. We’ll be touching on larger topics like democracy, presentation, player mindsets, effort, and resource consumption. It’ll induce a fantastic bout of depression, so don’t get left behind.
5-1 - Designing a Skill
Thus far, Jagex has offered three potential skills to OSRS, each of which has been denied. This gives us the advantage of understanding how the skill design process works behind the scenes and lets us examine some of the issues Jagex has faced with presenting a skill to the players. The first problem is the “one strike and you’re out” phenomenon. Simply put, players don’t like applying much effort into reading and learning. They’ll look at a developer blog highlighting a new skill idea, and if you’re lucky they’ll even read the whole thing, but how about the second developer blog? The third? Fourth? Even I find it hard to get that far. In general, people don’t like long detail-heavy essays or blogs, which is why I can invoke the ancient proverb “Ban Emily” into this post and it’ll go (almost) completely unnoticed. No matter how many improvements you make between developer blogs, you will quickly lose players with each new iteration. Similarly, developer blogs don’t have the time to talk about skill design philosophy or meta-analyse their ideas – players would get lost far too fast. This is the Second Great Irony of skill design: the more iterations you have of a lengthy idea, the less players will keep up with you. This was particularly prominent with Warding: Battle Wards were offered in an early developer blog but were quickly cut when Jagex realized how bad the idea was. Yet people would still cite Battle Wards as the reason they voted against Warding, despite the idea having been dropped several blogs before. Similarly, people would often comment that they hated that Warding was being polled multiple times; it felt to them like Jagex was trying to brute-force it into the game. But Warding was only ever polled once, and only after the fourth developer blog - the confusion was drawn from how many times the skill was reiterated and from the length of the public design process. Sure, there are people for whom this runs the opposite way; they keep a close eye on updates and judge a piece of content on the merits of the latest iteration, but this is much less common. You could argue that one should simply disregard the ignorant people as blind comments don't contribute to the overall discussion, but you should remember that these players are also the ones voting for the respective piece of content. You could also suggest re-educating them, which is exactly what Jagex attempts with each developer blog, and still people won’t get the memo. And when it comes to the players themselves, can the playerbase really be relied on to re-educate itself? Overall, the Second Great irony really hurts the development process and is practically an unavoidable issue. What’s the alternative? To remove the developer-player interface that leads to valuable reiterations, or does you simply have to get the skill perfect in the first developer blog? It’s not an optimal idea, but it could help: have a small team of “delegates” – larger names that players can trust, or player influencers – come in to review a new, unannounced skill idea under NDA. If they like it, chances are that other players will too. If they don’t, reiterate or toss out the skill before it’s public. That way, you’ve had a board of experienced players who are willing to share their opinions to the public helping to determine the meat and potatoes of the skill before it is introduced to the casual eye. Now, a more polished and well-accepted product can be presented on the first run of selling a skill to the public, resulting in less reiterations being required, and demanding less effort from the average player to be fully informed over the skill’s final design.
5-2 - Presentation and Beta Testing
So you’ve got a great idea, but how are you going to sell it to the public? Looking at how the OSRS Team has handled it throughout the years, there’s a very obvious learning curve occurring. Artisan had almost nothing but text blogs being thrown to the players, Sailing started introducing some concept art and even a trailer with terrible audio recording, and Warding had concept art, in game models, gifs, and a much fancier trailer with in-game animations. A picture or video is worth a thousand words, and often the only words that players will take out of a developer blog. You might say that presentation is everything, and that would be more true in OSRS than most games. Most activities in OSRS are extremely basic, involve minimal thought, and are incredibly grindy. Take Fishing: you click every 20 seconds on a fishing spot that is randomly placed along a section of water, get rid of your fish, then keep clicking those fishing spots. Boiling it down further, you click several arbitrary parts of your computer screen every 20 seconds. It’s hardly considered engaging, so why do some people enjoy it? Simply put: presentation. You’re given a peaceful riverside environment to chill in, you’re collecting a bunch of pixels shaped like fish, and a number tracking your xp keeps ticking up and telling you that it matters. Now imagine coming to the players with a radical new skill idea: Mining. You describe that Mining is where you gather ores that will feed into Smithing and help create gear for players to use. The audience ponders momentarily, but they’re not quite sure it feels right and ask for a demonstration. You show them some gameplay, but your development resources were thin and instead of rocks, you put trees as placeholders. Instead of ores in your inventory, you put logs as placeholders. Instead of a pickaxe, your character is swinging a woodcutting axe as a placeholder. Sure, the mechanics might act like mining instead of woodcutting, but how well is the skill going to sell if you haven’t presented it correctly or respected it contextually? Again, presentation is everything. Players need to be able to see the task they are to perform, see the tools they’ll use, and see the expected outcomes; otherwise, whatever you’re trying to sell will feel bland and unoriginal. And this leads to the next level of skill presentation that has yet to be employed: Beta Worlds. Part of getting the feel of an activity is not just watching, it but acting it out as well - you’ll never understand the thrill of skydiving unless you’ve actually been skydiving. Beta Worlds are that chance for players to act out a concept without risking the real game’s health. A successful Beta can inspire confidence in players that the skill has a solid Core and interesting Expansions, while a failed Beta will make them glad that they got to try it and be fully informed before putting the skill to a poll (although that might be a little too optimistic for rage culture). Unfortunately, Betas are not without major disadvantages, the most prominent of which we shall investigate next.
5-3 - Development Effort
If you thought that the previous section on Skill Design Philosophy was lengthy and exhausting, imagine having to know all that information and then put it into practice.Mentally designing a skill in your head can be fun, but putting all that down on paper and making it actually work together, feel fully fleshed out, and following all the modern standards that players expect is extremely heavy work, especially when it’s not guaranteed to pay off in the polls like Quest or Slayer content. That’s not even taking into account the potentially immense cost of developing a new skill should it pass a poll. Whenever people complain that Jagex is wasting their resources trying to make that specific skill work, Jagex has been very explicit about the costs to pull together a design blog being pretty minimal. Looking at the previous blogs, Jagex is probably telling the truth. It’s all just a bunch of words, a couple art sketches, and maybe a basic in-game model or gif. Not to downplay the time it takes to write well, design good models, or generate concept art, but it’s nothing like the scale of resources that some players make it out to be. Of course, if a Beta was attempted as suggested last section, this conversation would take a completely new turn, and the level of risk to invested resources would exponentially increase. But this conversation calls to mind an important question: how much effort and resources do skills require to feel complete? Once upon a time, you could release a skill which was more or less unfinished. Take Slayer: it was released in 2005 with a pretty barebones structure. The fundamentals were all there, but the endgame was essentially a couple cool best-in-slot weapons and that was it. Since then, OSRS has updated the skill to include a huge Reward Shop system, feature 50% more monsters to slay, and to become an extremely competitive money-maker. Skills naturally undergo development over time, but it so often comes up during the designing of an OSRS skill that it "doesn't have enough to justify its existence." This was touched on deeply in Section 3-13 – Skill Bloat, but deserves reiterating here. While people recognize that skills continually evolve, the modern standard expects a new skill, upon release, to be fully preassembled before purchase. Whereas once you could get away with releasing just a skill's Core and working on Expansions down the line, that is no longer the case. But perhaps a skill might stand a better chance now than it did last year, given that the OSRS Team has doubled in number since that time. However, judging from the skill design phases that have previously been attempted (as we’ve yet to see a skill development phase), the heaviest cost has been paid in developer mentality and motivational loss. When a developer is passionate about an idea, they spend their every waking hour pouring their mind into how that idea is going to function,especially while they’re not at work. And then they’re obligated to take player feedback and adapt their ideas, sometimes starting from scratch, particularly over something as controversial as a skill. Even if they have tough enough skin to take the heavy criticism that comes with skill design, having to write and rewrite repeatedly over the same idea to make it “perfect” is mentally exhausting. Eventually, their motivation drains as their labour bears little fruit with the audience, and they simply want to push it to the poll and be done with it. Even once all their cards are down, there’s still no guarantee that their efforts will be rewarded, even less so when it comes to skills. With such a high mental cost with a low rate of success, you have to ask, “Was it worth it?” And that’s why new skill proposals are far and few between. A new skill used to be exciting for the development team in the actual days of 2007, as they had the developmental freedom to do whatever they wanted, but in the modern day that is not so much the case.
5-4 - The Problems of Democracy
Ever since the conceptualization of democracy in the real world, people have been very aware of its disadvantages. And while I don’t have the talent, knowledge, or time to discuss every one of these factors, there are a few that are very relevant when it comes to the OSRS Team and the polling process. But first we should recognize the OSRS Team’s relationship with the players. More and more, the Team acts like a government to its citizens, the players, and although this situation was intentionally instated with OSRS’s release, it’s even more prominent now. The Team decides the type of content that gets to go into a poll, and the players get their input over whether that particular piece makes it in. Similarly, players make suggestions to the Team that, in many cases, the Team hadn’t thought of themselves. This synergy is phenomenal and almost unheard of among video games, but the polling system changes the mechanics of this relationship. Polls were introduced to the burned and scarred population of players at OSRS’s release in 2013. Many of these players had just freshly come off RS2 after a series of disastrous updates or had quit long before from other controversies. The Squeal of Fortune, the Evolution of Combat, even the original Wilderness Removal had forced numerous players out and murdered their trust in Jagex. To try and get players to recommit to Runescape, Jagex offered OSRS a polling system by which the players would determine what went into the game, where the players got to hold all the cards. They also asked the players what threshold should be required for polled items to pass, and among the odd 50% or 55% being shouted out, the vast majority of players wanted 70%, 75%, 80%, or even 85%. There was a massive population in favour of a conservative game that would mostly remain untouched, and therefore kept pure from the corruption RS2 had previously endured. Right from the start, players started noticing holes in this system. After all, the OSRS Team was still the sole decider of what would actually be polled in the first place. Long-requested changes took forever to be polled (if ever polled at all) if the OSRS Team didn’t want to deal with that particular problem or didn’t like that idea. Similarly, the Team essentially had desk jobs with a noose kept around their neck – they could perform almost nothing without the players, their slave masters, seeing, criticizing, and tearing out every inch of developmental or visionary freedom they had. Ever hear about the controversy of Erin the duck? Take a look at the wiki or do a search through the subreddit history. It’s pretty fantastic, and a good window into the minds of the early OSRS playerbase. But as the years have gone on, the perspective of the players has shifted. There is now a much healthier and more trusting relationship between them and the Team, much more flexibility in what the players allow the Team to handle, and a much greater tolerance and even love of change. But the challenges of democracy haven’t just fallen away. Everyone having the right to vote is a fundamental tenet of the democratic system, but unfortunately that also means that everyone has the right to vote. For OSRS, that means that every member, whether it’s their first day in game, their ten thousandth hour played, those who have no idea about what the poll’s about, those who haven’t read a single quest (the worst group), those who RWT and bot, those who scam and lure, and every professional armchair developer like myself get to vote. In short, no one will ever be perfectly informed on every aspect of the game, or at least know when to skip when they should. Similarly, people will almost never vote in favour of making their game harder, even at the cost of game integrity, or at least not enough people would vote in such a fashion to reach a 75% majority. These issues are well recognized. The adoption of the controversial “integrity updates” was Jagex’s solution to these problems. In this way, Jagex has become even more like a government to the players. The average citizen of a democratic country cannot and will not make major decisions that favour everyone around themselves if it comes at a personal cost. Rather, that’s one of the major roles of a government: to make decisions for changes for the common good that an individual can’t or won’t make on their own. No one’s going to willingly hand over cash to help repave a road on the opposite side of the city – that’s why taxes are a necessary evil. It’s easy to see that the players don’t always know what’s best for their game and sometimes need to rely on that parent to decide for them, even if it results in some personal loss. But players still generally like the polls, and Jagex still appears to respect them for the most part. Being the government of the game, Jagex could very well choose to ignore them, but would risk the loss of their citizens to other lands. And there are some very strong reasons to keep them: the players still like having at least one hand on the wheel when it comes to new content or ideas. Also, it acts as a nice veto card should Jagex try to push RS3’s abusive tactics on OSRS and therefore prevent such potential damage. But now we come to the topic of today: the introduction of a new skill. Essentially, a new skill must pass a poll in order to enter the game. While it’s easy to say, “If a skill idea is good enough, it’ll pass the threshold,” that’s not entirely true. The only skill that could really pass the 75% mark is not necessarily a well-designed skill, but rather a crowd-pleasing skill. While the two aren’t mutually exclusive, the latter is far easier to make than the former. Take Dungeoneering: if you were to poll it today as an exact replica of RS2’s version, it would likely be the highest scoring skill yet, perhaps even passing, despite every criticism that’s been previously emphasized describing why it has no respect for the current definition of “skill.” Furthermore, a crowd-pleasing skill can easily fall prey to deindividualization of vision and result in a bland “studio skill” (in the same vein as a “studio film”), one that feels manufactured by a board of soulless machines rather than a director’s unique creation. This draws straight back to the afore-mentioned issues with democracy: that people A) don’t always understand what they’re voting for or against, and B) people will never vote for something that makes their game tougher or results in no benefit to oneself. Again, these were not issues in the old days of RS2, but are the problems we face with our modern standards and decision making systems. The reality that must be faced is that the polling system is not an engine of creation nor is it a means of constructive feedback – it’s a system of judgement, binary and oversimplified in its methodology. It’s easy to interact with and requires no more than 10 seconds of a player’s time, a mere mindless moment, to decide the fate of an idea made by an individual or team, regardless of their deep or shallow knowledge of game mechanics, strong or weak vision of design philosophy, great or terrible understanding of the game’s history, and their awareness of blindness towards the modern community. It’s a system which disproportionately boils down the quality of discussion that is necessitated by a skill, which gives it the same significance as the question “Should we allow players to recolour the Rocky pet by feeding it berries?” with the only available answers being a dualistic “This idea is perfect and should be implemented exactly as outlined” or “This idea is terrible and should never be spoken of again.” So what do you do? Let Jagex throw in whatever they want? Reduce the threshold, or reduce it just for skills? Make a poll that lists a bunch of skills and forces the players to choose one of them to enter the game? Simply poll the question, “Should we have a new skill?” then let Jagex decide what it is? Put more options on the scale of “yes” to “no” and weigh each appropriately? All these options sound distasteful because there are obvious weaknesses to each. But that is the Third Great Irony we face: an immense desire for a new skill, but no realistic means to ever get one.
6-0 - Conclusion
I can only imagine that if you’ve truly read everything up to this point, it’s taken you through quite the rollercoaster. We’ve walked through the history of OSRS skill attempts, unconstructive arguments, various aspects of modern skill design philosophy, and the OSRS Team and skill design process. When you take it all together, it’s easy to get overwhelmed by all the thought that needs to go into a modern skill and all the issues that might prevent its success. Complexity, naming conventions, categorizations, integration, rewards and motivations, bankstanding and buyables, the difficulties of skill bloat, balancing, and skill endgames, aesthetics, the design process, public presentation, development effort, democracy and polling - these are the challenges of designing and introducing modern skills. To have to cope with it all is draining and maybe even impossible, and therefore it begs the question: is trying to get a new skill even worth it? Maybe. Thanks for reading. Tl;dr: Designing a modern skill requires acknowledging the vast history of Runescape, understanding why players make certain criticisms and what exactly they’re saying in terms of game mechanics, before finally developing solutions. Only then can you subject your ideas to a polling system that is built to oversimplify them.
i'm new in this forex stuff (not even starting yet) & first time visiting Forex. But i've read that forex basically gambling (guessing either it goes up or down, and you got previous data as reference). I'm also read about foolproof gambling tricks that works in real life roulette. Basically it goes like this :
bet $1 on red - if you win, repeat step 1.
if you lose, bet $3. if you win, repeat step 1.
if you lose again, bet $6. if you win, repeat step 1.
if you lose again, bet $14. if you win repeat step 1.
if you lose again, bet $31. if you win, repeat step 1
so, can this be apply on forex trading? (there's lot ads about forex trading apps, thinking to try it) can't profit big, but seem cant lose either. might be a good strategy. any thought? edit 1 : what i mean in this forex is binary options, which some forex trading apps operates. edit 2 : it takes 5 unlucky trading before $55 account blown off. is that really common to get 5 unlucky trading in a row? edit 3 : here's the math (cnp from reply) some forex apps (like expert option or olymp trade) operate on binary option (this is unregulated securities?) where usually they give 80% return on trade. the math goes like this :
$1 trade and win = $0.80 profit
lose then $3 trade and win = $2.4 - $1 (lose) = $1.4 profit
lose then $6 trade and win = $4.8 - $4 (lose) = $0.8 profit
lose then $14 trade and win = $11.2 - $10 (lose) = $1.2 profit
lose then $31 trade and win = $24.8 - $24 (lose) = $0.8 profit
profit means got back your initial too
edit 4 : some reply said **binary options type forex trading apps** are scam & fraud. bummer. maybe trading via smartphone isnt easy as i thought. edit 5 : still, add some ability to reading indicator & chart could help avoiding 5 unlucky trading in a row. damn, if i'm a programmer, i'll make a trading bots based on this idea xD
The narrative of Euro Truck Simulator 2 or why Spec Ops: The Line isn’t the only best single-player campaign of 2012
Too long, won’t read: I see stories and moral choices in a game that has neither. Obligatory sorry for my English. For this whole post to make sense (to me at least), I want to preface that I am the kind of casual/hardcore gamer that plays casually only a few games that do not fit any “perceived” genre. Put it simply, the list of games I have played for more than 200 hours each includes League of Legends (mostly with bots nowadays but still), Monster Hunter World, World of Warships, Skyrim, Witcher 3, Spec Ops: The Lines (yes the 2012 depressing single-player game for over 200 hours), Call of Duty 1 and 2 (only the single-player campaign, yes again for more than 200 hours), Civilization 5 and 6, Shogun 2 Total War, Islanders, Cities Skylines, Banished, Valkyria Chronicles 1 and 4, and Guild Wars 2 (MMORPG, I was a raider). From this list, I tend to think of myself as a “young” gamer that wants a lot of stimulation and excitement from gameplays and can perform quick reaction or demanding mechanics. It also shows my interest in storytelling (within games and in general), watching Yatzhee’s Zero Punctuation and Raycevick in addition to, for example, Lessons from the Screenplay (screenplay, duh), Lindsay Ellis (academic theory on films and musicals), and Sideways (academic theory on music). So if you know Euro Truck Simulator 2 (ETS2), you’ll be wondering what the hell am I writing here. For those that don’t know, ETS2 is a purely mechanical game with no narratives or moral choice. The primary gameplay loop is you are a trucker, you pick a job and drive the cargo across Europe. The secondary gameplay loops contain configuring the truck so it can run faster and smoother. And with each job, you earn money to buy garages, hire drivers and expand your fleet of trucks. But the intended value of the game is in the driving and modding the truck. In the word of Yatzhee of ZP, this is a “dad’s game”, games that aim for realism to the point of grindy and boring that reminds “dad” of his boring accountant job before he retired. Yeah, it goes well in my game list. I came to ETS2 completely coincidental. Last week, I was looking for a new game when I see Bus Simulator is free on iOS (yes, I play gacha on mobile too, thankfully never cross the 50 hours mark). After ramming my bus into the first car I see, I remembered “hey there’s this game called ETS2” and Steam was having a discount. So I played the demo, bought the base game, and nearly 24 in-game hours and 3 interesting insights later, here we are. 1/Mechanic I don’t even know how to drive in real life. But I can braindead driving 900km from Poland to France in half an hour and it’s relaxing. 2/Stories This is the main reason why the game captivates me. The first “revelation” when I boarded a ferry to go from France to the UK. I instantly ran into a car as soon as I drove out of port, not realizing that the UK is this backward country that drives on the left side instead of on the right side like every other civilization. Then it made me question how truckers deal with this issue when they have to make frequent delivery across the English Channel. And then the floodgate opened. Perhaps this is more me being nostalgic than the game “having a story”, but the game did well putting me in the shoes of the trucker and reminded me of all of the stories I heard about the trucker life. In my home country, truckers drove from north to south in mere days, driving at night with a co-driver to make sure they deliver on time or stopping quickly at a rest stop for a bite or a nap. The game doesn’t have a co-driver, doesn’t have a “hunger” mechanic, only tells you to stop at a gas station and hit buttons to imagine “sleeping”. But in the routine stops for gas and sleep, I subconsciously roleplayed those stories I heard, imagined the real lives of people having to run at night to avoid traffic or speeding on the highway to make deadline. I remembered the truckers sharing knowledge of which roads to take to avoid toll or take detours, which roads have cameras or polices, or even which rest stop has nice food. I even remembered horror stories of truckers having a family in one city and flirting and impregnating waitresses or innocent local girls. The game doesn’t have any of these. It just has driving. I guess I appreciate how the game doesn’t try to force a story. It just mimics lives to an extent and let me fill in the blank. In a weird way, it plays like a Grand Theft Auto sandbox where following the traffic rules and imagining the complex life of the person whose car I just take is as fun as actually running over that person. 3/Moral choice I hope I am a good in-game person. I pondered my choices while playing the Witcher to make the NPCs happy. I imagined the nonexistent lives of citizens in all the city-builder or empire-building games I play to motivate me to become a benign ruler. I try to do the same in ETS2, following the traffic rules, trying to deliver the cargo in time so a kid will have a computer for a birthday, or a farmer gets the much-needed tractor for work. And then I discover “Option”, which can remove the speed limit and traffic offense. The moment I ram my truck headfirst into a sedan in a roundabout in downtown Amsterdam at 20:32 then laughed maniacally as I drove away onto the highway was when I kissed my Reddit lurker life goodbye. It was a trivial yet paradoxically fantastic moment for me when I realized how I was “making a choice” in a game that doesn’t have this bucket of choice. The car I just rammed into does not have a person inside, does not have a life, isn’t running home for dinner after a long day of work. It was just a game mechanic designed to take 400 Euros away from me. Yet, I kept thinking about that moment for the rest of the drive to Paris. While ramming into the firefighters trying to clean up a traffic accident on the highway. I remembered the discourse on binary choice mechanic back in the day when games force players to choose between “good” and “bad” as if life is as straight forward as that. Or games like Frostpunk or This War is Mine that forces a consequence on your decision, hinting that what you did was morally wrong, even if you agree with it or not. Euro Truck Simulator 2 does not have this mechanic. It isn’t even designed to take part in this discussion. All it has is driving. So either I am deranged enough to be a novelist or Euro Truck Simulator 2 tells a greater horror than a First Person Shooter military shooter does. Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
Option Bot 2.0 Review. Option Bot 2 is one of the most popular binary option robots there is available today. When we got the opportunity to offer this particular excellent binary option robot to our customers for free, we did not hesitate for a moment to start the cooperation with them. Unlike the real robot and binary hedge fund, Option Bot 2 is not fully automated binary trading software ... Binary Option Robot. Free Auto Trading Software. Kostenloses Konto eröffnen. Sie haben bereits ein Konto? Hier einloggen. Es ist einfach! Nur 3 Schritte! 1. Registieren . Dauert nur eine Minute. 2. Einzahlen. Ihre Einzahlung ist sicher und geschützt! 3. Autotraden. 83% durchschnittliche Erfolgsquote! Jetzt registrieren Sie haben bereits ein Konto? Einloggen. Kompatible Broker. Unser Bot ... Dies macht es Ihnen leicht, die Software zu verwenden, um von binäre option bot 2.0 auf der Welt Handel zu machen. Es ist immer ratsam, sich mit jedem der 9 Broker, die Binäre option bot 2.0 unterstützen, in Verbindung zu setzen, um sicherzustellen, dass derjenige, mit dem Sie Ihr Geld anlegen, tatsächlich in Ihrer Interactive brokers tws manual operieren darf. Die Empfehlung ist nicht ... Option Bot 2.0. Option Bot 2.0 is set to release on July 1st. This is a binary options signal software, one of the first heavily marketed systems on the market. I feel it is necessary for me to provide a review of this system and let you know the important details as I am sure you will come across this system somewhere along the line. Option Bot 2.0 is a binary options trading system that was created by Gary Davis. Option Bot 2.0 is not a fully automated trading robot like most trading systems. It looks for the best trading signals by analyzing market data and trends and then provides you with the best signals and advice. You then would have to manually decide how you wish to proceed in your trading endeavors. Option Bot 2.0 é um sistema de negociação de opções binárias que foi criado por Gary Davis. Option Bot 2.0 não é um robô de negociação totalmente automatizado como a maioria dos sistemas de negociação. Ele procura os melhores sinais comerciais, analisando dados de mercado e tendências e, em seguida, fornece-lhe os melhores sinais e Option Bot 2 Bewertung Betrug Oder Nicht? Option Bot 2 is one of the most popular binary option robots there is available today. When we got the opportunity to offer this particular excellent binary option robot to our customers for free, we did not hesitate for a moment to start the cooperation with them. Unlike the real robot and binary hedge fund, Option Bot 2 is not fully automated binary ...
Amazing binary Option Free bot v2.0 No Loss 99 % ...
Greetings to all on the channel Trader Tools! Do not forget to like this video and subscribe to the channel so as not to miss new videos. Binary options trad... Best Binary Options Brokers for this Strategy: 1. 💲💹IQ Option FREE DEMO: http://www.cryptobinarylivingway.com/IQOption1 2. 💲💹Pocket Option FREE DEMO: http The road to success through trading IQ option Best Bot Reviews Iq Option 2020 ,We make videos using this softwhere bot which aims to make it easier for you t... DOWNLOAD FREE http://bit.ly/2CSd0C0orCONECT WITH ME TO GET IT https://goo.gl/7tRX2nBINARY BOT FREE DOWNLOADbinary robot downloadbinary robot freebinary robot ... Free robot IQ Option. Binary bot 2020 Installing the robot IQ Option: http://bit.ly/38t4yag Link to IQ Option: http://bit.ly/2Q6WGDJ Free robot Olymp Trade: ... based on - Free Download Binary Option Bot- Robot// Auto Trading Signal Software 2019 hindi -----... join our signal group:- https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAE6760K2szQ3-o-xgw open real or demo account True ECN Broker: https://goo.gl/obfYx8 download this one:- htt... Binary Options Robot - Automated Binary Options Trading Using Binary Option Robot Test Binary Options Robot here - http://track.logic.expert/67b0b668-c6a4-42... Downlink Link- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E0nI95H36ulU96ziYHfEYTe1Er5QHb9l/view?usp=sharing Free signals group- https://t.me/BullishKingsignals Get 50%... 2 Minutes Strategy Binary Options 2020 (IQ Options) - YouTube. 2 Minutes Strategy Binary Options 2020 (IQ Options) Watch later. Share. Copy link. Info. Shopping. Tap to unmute. If playback doesn't...